[Thu Aug  9 06:16:30 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (386.9, 250.5) = 20 53 44.52 31 26 35.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 120.6 +/- 18.8
  Background counts = 105.4
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Thu Aug  9 06:16:30 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.29'
[Thu Aug  9 11:36:32 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.07 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Aug  9 11:36:32 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.07"
[Thu Aug  9 11:36:32 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.946
[Thu Aug  9 11:36:32 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 0, mean size = 10.07"
[Thu Aug  9 11:50:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 11:50:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Thu Aug  9 11:50:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 11:50:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Thu Aug  9 11:50:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug  9 11:50:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 11:50:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 11:50:37 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4 appears to have run properly
[Thu Aug  9 11:51:09 2012] Warning: source 4 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 5 at 12.249106 pixels away
[Thu Aug  9 11:51:09 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Aug  9 11:51:09 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Aug  9 11:51:09 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Aug  9 11:51:09 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Aug  9 11:51:09 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Aug  9 16:18:37 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.07 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Aug  9 16:18:37 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.07"
[Thu Aug  9 16:18:37 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.946
[Thu Aug  9 16:18:37 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 10.07"
[Thu Aug  9 16:30:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 16:30:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 16:30:18 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4 appears to have run properly
[Thu Aug  9 16:30:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 16:30:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 16:30:18 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4 appears to have run properly
[Thu Aug  9 16:30:50 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1180.460000, observed total counts = 1199.000000
[Thu Aug  9 16:30:50 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 5 = 0.310455 pixels
[Thu Aug  9 16:30:50 2012] 1182.418000 total counts/ 1129.320000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.580046
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 5 = 0.310455 pixels
  Position = (386.6, 250.6) = 20 53 44.62 31 26 36.1
  Extent = 4.3" x 4.3", rotation angle = 1
  Source counts = 53.1 +/- 34.4
  Background counts = 1129.3
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.002
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability