[Sat May 11 07:54:12 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (369.6, 306.9) = 20 55 6.47 31 46 8.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 223.9 +/- 27.3
  Background counts = 375.0
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.003

[Sat May 11 07:54:14 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.20'
[Sat May 11 07:55:20 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.03 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 11 07:55:20 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.03"
[Sat May 11 07:55:20 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.603
[Sat May 11 07:55:20 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 0, mean size = 9.03"
[Sat May 11 07:55:21 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg exists
[Sat May 11 07:55:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Sat May 11 07:55:21 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 11 07:55:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Sat May 11 07:55:21 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 11 07:55:23 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Sat May 11 07:55:23 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 11 07:55:23 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12 appears to have run properly
[Sat May 11 07:56:21 2013] Source 28 is offset by 2.814696 and 6.737603 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.339177 x 1.339177, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 11 07:56:21 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 11 07:56:21 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 11 07:56:21 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 11 07:56:21 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 11 07:56:21 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 11 07:56:21 2013] Source is confused with source 25
[Sat May 11 07:57:01 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.03 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 11 07:57:01 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.03"
[Sat May 11 07:57:01 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.603
[Sat May 11 07:57:01 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 1, mean size = 9.03"
[Sat May 11 07:57:02 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg exists
[Sat May 11 07:57:02 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 11 07:57:02 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12 appears to have run properly
[Sat May 11 07:57:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Sat May 11 07:57:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 11 07:57:04 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12 appears to have run properly
[Sat May 11 07:57:54 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 5022.010000, observed total counts = 4898.000000
[Sat May 11 07:57:54 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 28 = 1.489311 pixels
[Sat May 11 07:57:54 2013] 4979.557300 total counts/ 4929.170000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.717686
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 28 = 1.489311 pixels
  Position = (371.1, 306.5) = 20 55 5.98 31 46 1.9
  Extent = 3.8 (2.3-8.2)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 50.4 +/- 70.6
  Background counts = 4929.2
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.005
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability