[Sat May 11 07:54:07 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (433.5, 462.0) = 20 54 44.60 31 57 22.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 122.1 +/- 22.1
  Background counts = 138.6
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.002

[Sat May 11 07:54:10 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 15.38'
[Sat May 11 07:55:16 2013] Using EEF radius (= 14.12 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 11 07:55:16 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Sat May 11 07:55:16 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.12"
[Sat May 11 07:55:16 2013] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 56, mask sum = 56, frac = 0.998
[Sat May 11 07:55:16 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 70 for pass 0, mean size = 14.12"
[Sat May 11 07:55:18 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70.ximg exists
[Sat May 11 07:55:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70.csv
[Sat May 11 07:55:18 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 11 07:55:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70.csv
[Sat May 11 07:55:18 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src70.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 11 07:55:20 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70.ximg exists
[Sat May 11 07:55:20 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 11 07:55:20 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src70 appears to have run properly
[Sat May 11 07:56:08 2013] Source 26 is offset by -6.818825 and 0.211093 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.621439 x 1.621439, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 11 07:56:08 2013] Warning, spatial fit 70 centroid is now closest to src. 45
[Sat May 11 07:56:08 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 11 07:56:08 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 11 07:56:08 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 11 07:56:08 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 11 07:56:08 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 11 07:56:08 2013] Source is confused with source 27
[Sat May 11 07:56:58 2013] Using EEF radius (= 14.12 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 11 07:56:58 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.12"
[Sat May 11 07:56:58 2013] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 56, mask sum = 56, frac = 0.998
[Sat May 11 07:56:58 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 60 for pass 1, mean size = 14.12"
[Sat May 11 07:57:00 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.ximg exists
[Sat May 11 07:57:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.csv
[Sat May 11 07:57:00 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 11 07:57:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.csv
[Sat May 11 07:57:00 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 11 07:57:01 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.ximg exists
[Sat May 11 07:57:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.csv
[Sat May 11 07:57:01 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 11 07:57:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.csv
[Sat May 11 07:57:01 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0082540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 11 07:57:41 2013] Warning, spatial fit 60 centroid is now closest to src. 47
[Sat May 11 07:57:42 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 11 07:57:42 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 11 07:57:42 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 11 07:57:42 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 11 07:57:42 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 11 07:57:42 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0