[Fri Mar  9 17:08:33 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (404.8, 317.4) = 21 58 22.50 -30 13 18.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 179.3 +/- 18.6
  Background counts = 44.4
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0005

[Fri Mar  9 17:08:34 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.84'
[Fri Mar  9 18:13:27 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.35 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Mar  9 18:13:27 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Fri Mar  9 18:13:27 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.35"
[Fri Mar  9 18:13:27 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.086
[Fri Mar  9 18:13:27 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 0, mean size = 10.35"
[Fri Mar  9 20:30:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0080940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 20:30:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0080940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Fri Mar  9 20:30:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0080940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 20:30:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0080940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Fri Mar  9 20:30:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0080940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0080940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar  9 20:30:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0080940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 20:30:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0080940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Fri Mar  9 20:30:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0080940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 20:30:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0080940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Fri Mar  9 20:30:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0080940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0080940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar  9 20:30:25 2012] Source 12 is offset by -2.366144 and 8.881591 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.189250 x 1.189250, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Mar  9 20:30:25 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Mar  9 20:30:25 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Mar  9 20:30:25 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Mar  9 20:30:25 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Mar  9 20:30:25 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Mar  9 21:03:22 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.35 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Mar  9 21:03:22 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.35"
[Fri Mar  9 21:03:22 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.086
[Fri Mar  9 21:03:22 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 10.35"
[Fri Mar  9 21:51:55 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0080940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 21:51:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0080940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Fri Mar  9 21:51:55 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0080940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 21:51:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0080940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Fri Mar  9 21:51:55 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0080940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0080940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar  9 21:51:55 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0080940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 21:51:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0080940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Fri Mar  9 21:51:55 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0080940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 21:51:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0080940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Fri Mar  9 21:51:55 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0080940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0080940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar  9 21:52:01 2012] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 12 at 18.917225 pixels away
[Fri Mar  9 21:52:01 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Mar  9 21:52:01 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Mar  9 21:52:01 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Mar  9 21:52:01 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Mar  9 21:52:01 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Mar  9 21:52:01 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9