[Fri May 24 13:04:00 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (255.7, 286.3) = 1 24 21.16 33 10 10.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 64.5 +/- 12.6
  Background counts = 38.3
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0006

[Fri May 24 13:04:00 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.22'
[Fri May 24 13:07:06 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.04 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 24 13:07:06 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.04"
[Fri May 24 13:07:06 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.134
[Fri May 24 13:07:06 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 54 for pass 0, mean size = 8.04"
[Fri May 24 16:14:27 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54.ximg exists
[Fri May 24 16:14:27 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54.csv
[Fri May 24 16:14:27 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 24 16:14:27 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54.csv
[Fri May 24 16:14:27 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 24 16:14:29 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54.ximg exists
[Fri May 24 16:14:29 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54.csv
[Fri May 24 16:14:29 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 24 16:14:29 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54.csv
[Fri May 24 16:14:29 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 24 21:32:40 2013] Source 56 is offset by -3.666513 and 3.204314 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.924032 x 0.924032, not incorporating fit results
[Fri May 24 21:32:40 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May 24 21:32:40 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May 24 21:32:40 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri May 24 21:32:40 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May 24 21:32:40 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May 24 21:33:18 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.04 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 24 21:33:18 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.04"
[Fri May 24 21:33:18 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.134
[Fri May 24 21:33:18 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 52 for pass 1, mean size = 8.04"
[Sat May 25 00:53:25 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src52.ximg exists
[Sat May 25 00:53:25 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src52.csv
[Sat May 25 00:53:25 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src52_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 25 00:53:25 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src52.csv
[Sat May 25 00:53:25 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src52_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src52.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 25 00:53:37 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src52.ximg exists
[Sat May 25 00:53:37 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src52.csv
[Sat May 25 00:53:37 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src52_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 25 00:53:37 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src52.csv
[Sat May 25 00:53:37 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src52_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src52.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 25 06:58:50 2013] Source 56 is offset by -4.188490 and 3.460337 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.029669 x 1.038110, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 25 06:58:50 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 25 06:58:50 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 25 06:58:50 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 25 06:58:50 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 25 06:58:50 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 25 06:58:50 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9