[Fri May 24 13:04:00 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (291.2, 307.1) = 1 24 8.85 33 11 42.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 82.5 +/- 12.9
  Background counts = 56.9
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0006

[Fri May 24 13:04:00 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.82'
[Fri May 24 13:07:06 2013] Using EEF radius (= 6.84 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 24 13:07:06 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.84"
[Fri May 24 13:07:06 2013] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 10, frac = 0.582
[Fri May 24 13:07:06 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 51 for pass 0, mean size = 6.84"
[Fri May 24 16:14:27 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src51.ximg exists
[Fri May 24 16:14:27 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src51.csv
[Fri May 24 16:14:27 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src51_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 24 16:14:27 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src51.csv
[Fri May 24 16:14:27 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src51_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src51.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 24 16:14:29 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.ximg exists
[Fri May 24 16:14:29 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.csv
[Fri May 24 16:14:29 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 24 16:14:29 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.csv
[Fri May 24 16:14:29 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 24 21:32:40 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 637.008000, observed total counts = 526.000000
[Fri May 24 21:32:40 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 53
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri May 24 21:32:40 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May 24 21:32:40 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May 24 21:32:40 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri May 24 21:32:40 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May 24 21:32:40 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May 24 21:33:18 2013] Using EEF radius (= 6.84 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 24 21:33:18 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.84"
[Fri May 24 21:33:18 2013] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 10, frac = 0.582
[Fri May 24 21:33:18 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 49 for pass 1, mean size = 6.84"
[Sat May 25 00:53:24 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.ximg exists
[Sat May 25 00:53:24 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.csv
[Sat May 25 00:53:24 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 25 00:53:24 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.csv
[Sat May 25 00:53:24 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 25 00:53:37 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.ximg exists
[Sat May 25 00:53:37 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.csv
[Sat May 25 00:53:37 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 25 00:53:37 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.csv
[Sat May 25 00:53:37 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0080540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 25 06:58:50 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 636.156000, observed total counts = 526.000000
[Sat May 25 06:58:50 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 53
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 25 06:58:50 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 25 06:58:50 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 25 06:58:50 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 25 06:58:50 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 25 06:58:50 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 25 06:58:50 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9