[Mon May 27 04:06:31 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (329.0, 331.9) = 15 1 41.30 -41 48 7.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 295.8 +/- 33.6
  Background counts = 336.9
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.0006

[Mon May 27 04:06:59 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.29'
[Mon May 27 04:11:13 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.07 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 27 04:11:13 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.07"
[Mon May 27 04:11:13 2013] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.721
[Mon May 27 04:11:13 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 91 for pass 0, mean size = 8.07"
[Mon May 27 04:11:17 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:11:17 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.csv
[Mon May 27 04:11:17 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:11:17 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.csv
[Mon May 27 04:11:17 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 27 04:11:19 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:11:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.csv
[Mon May 27 04:11:19 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:11:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.csv
[Mon May 27 04:11:19 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 27 04:12:26 2013] Source 95 is offset by -7.401063 and 3.710225 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.995908 x 0.995908, not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 27 04:12:26 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 27 04:12:26 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 27 04:12:26 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 27 04:12:26 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 27 04:12:26 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 27 04:15:24 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.07 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 27 04:15:24 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.07"
[Mon May 27 04:15:24 2013] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.721
[Mon May 27 04:15:24 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 84 for pass 1, mean size = 8.07"
[Mon May 27 04:15:28 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src84.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:15:28 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src84.csv
[Mon May 27 04:15:28 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src84_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:15:28 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src84.csv
[Mon May 27 04:15:28 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src84_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src84.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 27 04:15:32 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src84.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:15:32 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src84.csv
[Mon May 27 04:15:32 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src84_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:15:32 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src84.csv
[Mon May 27 04:15:32 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src84_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src84.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 3384.270000, observed total counts = 3020.000000
[Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 95
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 27 04:20:06 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(28576.427551, 28829.353607, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Mon May 27 04:20:06 2013] Not overwriting source region fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95_src.reg
[Mon May 27 04:20:06 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (292, 294) - (367, 369)
[Mon May 27 04:20:06 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(28576.427551, 28829.353607, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26155.339400, 28090.494400, 1172.352034, 1172.352034, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19341.902000, 33030.034000, 8167.800235, 8167.800235, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30716.224518, 31494.639282, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28150.605988, 29507.169312, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30125.807068, 28831.493561, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26856.897827, 28476.226746, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24650.228000, 28866.704000, 1844.936053, 1844.936053, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25567.793488, 25966.241699, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26633.200989, 26494.404022, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Mon May 27 04:20:06 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src95.gif