[Mon May 27 04:06:29 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (333.0, 355.1) = 15 1 39.76 -41 46 26.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 139.0 +/- 23.7
  Background counts = 233.8
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0005

[Mon May 27 04:06:59 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.81'
[Mon May 27 04:11:13 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.84 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 27 04:11:13 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.84"
[Mon May 27 04:11:13 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.171
[Mon May 27 04:11:13 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 75 for pass 0, mean size = 8.84"
[Mon May 27 04:11:16 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src75.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:11:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src75.csv
[Mon May 27 04:11:16 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src75_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:11:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src75.csv
[Mon May 27 04:11:16 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src75_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src75.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 27 04:11:19 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src75.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:11:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src75.csv
[Mon May 27 04:11:19 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src75_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:11:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src75.csv
[Mon May 27 04:11:19 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src75_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src75.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 27 04:12:25 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1602.480000, observed total counts = 1207.000000
[Mon May 27 04:12:25 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 79
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 27 04:12:26 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 27 04:12:26 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 27 04:12:26 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 27 04:12:26 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 27 04:12:26 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 27 04:15:24 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.84 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 27 04:15:24 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.84"
[Mon May 27 04:15:24 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.171
[Mon May 27 04:15:24 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 68 for pass 1, mean size = 8.84"
[Mon May 27 04:15:28 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:15:28 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.csv
[Mon May 27 04:15:28 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:15:28 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.csv
[Mon May 27 04:15:28 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 27 04:15:31 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:15:31 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.csv
[Mon May 27 04:15:31 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:15:31 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.csv
[Mon May 27 04:15:31 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1600.750000, observed total counts = 1207.000000
[Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 79
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9