[Mon May 27 04:06:21 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (181.1, 464.8) = 15 2 38.72 -41 38 28.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 130.7 +/- 24.0 Background counts = 143.1 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004 [Mon May 27 04:06:59 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.76' [Mon May 27 04:11:13 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.81 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon May 27 04:11:13 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass [Mon May 27 04:11:13 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.81" [Mon May 27 04:11:13 2013] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 53, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.037 [Mon May 27 04:11:13 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 15 for pass 0, mean size = 13.81" [Mon May 27 04:11:15 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.ximg exists [Mon May 27 04:11:15 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.csv [Mon May 27 04:11:15 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15_1.ximg exists [Mon May 27 04:11:15 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.csv [Mon May 27 04:11:15 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon May 27 04:11:17 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.ximg exists [Mon May 27 04:11:17 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.csv [Mon May 27 04:11:17 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg exists [Mon May 27 04:11:17 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.csv [Mon May 27 04:11:17 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon May 27 04:12:24 2013] Warning: source 15 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 17 at 16.988476 pixels away [Mon May 27 04:12:26 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon May 27 04:12:26 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon May 27 04:12:26 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Mon May 27 04:12:26 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Mon May 27 04:12:26 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon May 27 04:15:24 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.81 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon May 27 04:15:24 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.81" [Mon May 27 04:15:24 2013] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 53, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.037 [Mon May 27 04:15:24 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 1, mean size = 13.81" [Mon May 27 04:15:26 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg exists [Mon May 27 04:15:26 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv [Mon May 27 04:15:26 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg exists [Mon May 27 04:15:26 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv [Mon May 27 04:15:26 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon May 27 04:15:29 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists [Mon May 27 04:15:29 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv [Mon May 27 04:15:29 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists [Mon May 27 04:15:29 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv [Mon May 27 04:15:29 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon May 27 04:16:44 2013] Warning: source 13 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 17 at 14.848644 pixels away [Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9