[Mon May 27 04:06:32 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (188.7, 323.8) = 15 2 35.88 -41 48 40.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 235.9 +/- 35.2
  Background counts = 512.0
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0006

[Mon May 27 04:06:59 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.16'
[Mon May 27 04:11:13 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 27 04:11:13 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.51"
[Mon May 27 04:11:13 2013] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.058
[Mon May 27 04:11:13 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 99 for pass 0, mean size = 10.51"
[Mon May 27 04:11:17 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:11:17 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:11:17 2013] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99 appears to have run properly
[Mon May 27 04:11:20 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:11:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.csv
[Mon May 27 04:11:20 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:11:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.csv
[Mon May 27 04:11:20 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 27 04:12:26 2013] Warning: source 99 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 103 at 12.664343 pixels away
[Mon May 27 04:12:26 2013] Source 103 is offset by -0.223937 and -9.194259 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.244520 x 1.244520, not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 27 04:12:26 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 27 04:12:26 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 27 04:12:26 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 27 04:12:26 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 27 04:12:26 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 27 04:15:24 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 27 04:15:24 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.51"
[Mon May 27 04:15:24 2013] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.058
[Mon May 27 04:15:24 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 92 for pass 1, mean size = 10.51"
[Mon May 27 04:15:28 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:15:28 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.csv
[Mon May 27 04:15:28 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:15:28 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.csv
[Mon May 27 04:15:28 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 27 04:15:32 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:15:32 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.csv
[Mon May 27 04:15:32 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:15:32 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.csv
[Mon May 27 04:15:32 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Warning, spatial fit 92 centroid is now closest to src. 104
[Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Source 103 is offset by -0.223937 and -9.194259 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.244520 x 1.244520, not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 27 04:16:45 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 27 04:20:08 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(16371.203445, 28118.785461, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Mon May 27 04:20:08 2013] Not overwriting source region fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src103_src.reg
[Mon May 27 04:20:08 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (151, 286) - (226, 361)
[Mon May 27 04:20:08 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(16371.203445, 28118.785461, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19341.902000, 33030.034000, 8167.800235, 8167.800235, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18324.809845, 29578.334717, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(16023.026400, 29401.572400, 1727.616050, 1727.616050, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(15561.167282, 27974.288147, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(14213.868683, 27413.463654, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(15024.431870, 27261.885376, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17319.737885, 26261.000397, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(15830.123077, 26060.381073, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19344.858826, 25974.697968, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(13923.154922, 25876.244171, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18222.714676, 25609.997833, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(16038.872101, 25509.717377, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17249.442001, 25185.846283, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Mon May 27 04:20:08 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src103.gif