[Mon May 27 04:07:27 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (307.8, 151.0) = 15 1 49.54 -42 1 13.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 242.0 +/- 31.2
  Background counts = 285.5
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0005

[Mon May 27 04:07:29 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.71'
[Mon May 27 04:11:20 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.78 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 27 04:11:20 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.78"
[Mon May 27 04:11:20 2013] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.874
[Mon May 27 04:11:20 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 99 for pass 0, mean size = 11.78"
[Mon May 27 04:11:24 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:11:24 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.csv
[Mon May 27 04:11:24 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:11:24 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.csv
[Mon May 27 04:11:24 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 27 04:11:26 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:11:26 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.csv
[Mon May 27 04:11:26 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:11:26 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.csv
[Mon May 27 04:11:26 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 27 04:12:58 2013] Warning, spatial fit 99 centroid is now closest to src. 192
[Mon May 27 04:12:58 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 27 04:12:58 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 27 04:12:58 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 27 04:12:58 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 27 04:12:58 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 27 04:15:33 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.78 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 27 04:15:33 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.78"
[Mon May 27 04:15:33 2013] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.874
[Mon May 27 04:15:33 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 92 for pass 1, mean size = 11.78"
[Mon May 27 04:15:37 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:15:37 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.csv
[Mon May 27 04:15:37 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:15:37 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.csv
[Mon May 27 04:15:37 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 27 04:15:43 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:15:43 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.csv
[Mon May 27 04:15:43 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 04:15:43 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.csv
[Mon May 27 04:15:43 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0077340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 27 04:17:20 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 3865.690000, observed total counts = 3831.000000
[Mon May 27 04:17:20 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 202 = 0.826913 pixels
[Mon May 27 04:17:20 2013] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 92 to 65
[Mon May 27 04:17:20 2013] 3867.570000 total counts/ 3867.570000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.000000
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 202 = 0.826913 pixels
  Position = (308.5, 151.5) = 15 1 49.28 -42 1 12.1
  Extent = 3.0" x 3.0", rotation angle = -0
  Source counts = 0.0 +/- 62.2
  Background counts = 3867.6
  Rate = 4e-20 +/- 0.001
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability