[Mon Jun  4 08:59:34 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (315.5, 191.5) = 9 53 34.70 1 28 52.6
  Extent = 21.7" x 21.7", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 18.8 +/- 7.4
  Background counts = 47.3
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.001

[Mon Jun  4 08:59:34 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.85'
[Mon Jun  4 09:40:20 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.35 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun  4 09:40:20 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Mon Jun  4 09:40:20 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.35"
[Mon Jun  4 09:40:20 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.754
[Mon Jun  4 09:40:20 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 10.35"
[Mon Jun  4 09:53:49 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0070940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  4 09:53:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0070940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Mon Jun  4 09:53:49 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0070940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  4 09:53:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0070940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Mon Jun  4 09:53:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0070940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0070940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun  4 09:53:49 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0070940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  4 09:53:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0070940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Mon Jun  4 09:53:49 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0070940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  4 09:53:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0070940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Mon Jun  4 09:53:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0070940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0070940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun  4 09:53:52 2012] Warning, spatial fit 7 centroid is now closest to src. 8
[Mon Jun  4 09:53:54 2012] Warning, spatial fit 7 centroid is now closest to src. 4
[Mon Jun  4 09:53:55 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 9 at 14.002571 pixels away
[Mon Jun  4 09:53:55 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun  4 09:53:55 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun  4 09:53:55 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun  4 09:53:55 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun  4 09:53:55 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun  4 10:36:32 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.35 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun  4 10:36:32 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.35"
[Mon Jun  4 10:36:32 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.754
[Mon Jun  4 10:36:32 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 10.35"
[Mon Jun  4 10:58:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0070940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  4 10:58:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0070940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  4 10:58:24 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0070940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jun  4 10:58:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0070940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  4 10:58:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0070940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Mon Jun  4 10:58:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0070940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  4 10:58:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0070940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Mon Jun  4 10:58:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0070940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0070940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun  4 10:58:34 2012] Source 9 is offset by -0.122102 and 2.905944 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.704658 x 2.704658, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun  4 10:58:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun  4 10:58:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun  4 10:58:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun  4 10:58:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun  4 10:58:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun  4 10:58:34 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0