[Wed Aug 15 18:50:26 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (341.5, 289.8) = 15 58 26.81 63 51 50.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 147.2 +/- 24.7
  Background counts = 234.5
  Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.006

[Wed Aug 15 18:50:27 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.18'
[Wed Aug 15 18:53:59 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Aug 15 18:53:59 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.02"
[Wed Aug 15 18:53:59 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.138
[Wed Aug 15 18:53:59 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 51 for pass 0, mean size = 8.02"
[Thu Aug 16 02:19:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src51.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 16 02:19:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src51.csv
[Thu Aug 16 02:19:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src51_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 16 02:19:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src51.csv
[Thu Aug 16 02:19:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src51_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src51.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug 16 02:19:21 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 16 02:19:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.csv
[Thu Aug 16 02:19:21 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 16 02:19:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.csv
[Thu Aug 16 02:19:21 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug 16 02:26:30 2012] Source 52 is offset by 1.164956 and -0.841012 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.957205 x 0.957205, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Aug 16 02:26:31 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1508.510000, observed total counts = 1188.000000
[Thu Aug 16 02:26:31 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 52
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Aug 16 02:26:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Aug 16 02:26:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Aug 16 02:26:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Aug 16 02:26:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Aug 16 02:26:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Aug 16 02:26:31 2012] Source is confused with source 54
[Thu Aug 16 02:26:31 2012] Source is confused with source 57
[Thu Aug 16 02:26:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Aug 16 02:26:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.02"
[Thu Aug 16 02:26:45 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.138
[Thu Aug 16 02:26:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 48 for pass 1, mean size = 8.02"
[Thu Aug 16 09:07:09 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src48.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 16 09:07:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src48.csv
[Thu Aug 16 09:07:09 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src48_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 16 09:07:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src48.csv
[Thu Aug 16 09:07:09 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src48_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src48.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug 16 09:07:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src48.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 16 09:07:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src48.csv
[Thu Aug 16 09:07:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src48_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 16 09:07:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src48.csv
[Thu Aug 16 09:07:12 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src48_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src48.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug 16 09:14:06 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1447.410000, observed total counts = 1188.000000
[Thu Aug 16 09:14:06 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 52
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Aug 16 09:14:06 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1589.400000, observed total counts = 1477.000000
[Thu Aug 16 09:14:06 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 52 = 0.920652 pixels
[Thu Aug 16 09:14:06 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 48 to 53
[Thu Aug 16 09:14:06 2012] 1571.202100 total counts/ 1555.980000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.385898
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 52 = 0.920652 pixels
  Position = (340.6, 290.1) = 15 58 27.38 63 51 51.8
  Extent = 2.1 (2.1-4.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 15.2 +/- 39.6
  Background counts = 1556.0
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.03
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability