[Wed Aug 15 18:50:27 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (390.9, 203.3) = 15 57 54.52 63 45 31.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 133.9 +/- 27.9
  Background counts = 255.7
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.004

[Wed Aug 15 18:50:27 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.62'
[Wed Aug 15 18:53:59 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.24 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Aug 15 18:53:59 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.24"
[Wed Aug 15 18:53:59 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.947
[Wed Aug 15 18:53:59 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 100 for pass 0, mean size = 11.24"
[Thu Aug 16 02:19:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src100.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 16 02:19:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src100.csv
[Thu Aug 16 02:19:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src100_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 16 02:19:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src100.csv
[Thu Aug 16 02:19:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src100_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src100.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug 16 02:19:22 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src100.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 16 02:19:22 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src100_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 16 02:19:22 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src100 appears to have run properly
[Thu Aug 16 02:26:31 2012] Warning: source 100 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 101 at 11.440992 pixels away
[Thu Aug 16 02:26:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Aug 16 02:26:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Aug 16 02:26:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Aug 16 02:26:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Aug 16 02:26:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Aug 16 02:26:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.24 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Aug 16 02:26:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.24"
[Thu Aug 16 02:26:45 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.947
[Thu Aug 16 02:26:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 95 for pass 1, mean size = 11.24"
[Thu Aug 16 09:07:10 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 16 09:07:10 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 16 09:07:10 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95 appears to have run properly
[Thu Aug 16 09:07:13 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src95.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 16 09:07:13 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src95_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 16 09:07:13 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0070340601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src95 appears to have run properly
[Thu Aug 16 09:14:07 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2493.250000, observed total counts = 2484.000000
[Thu Aug 16 09:14:07 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 101 = 0.718603 pixels
[Thu Aug 16 09:14:07 2012] 2469.320100 total counts/ 2426.500000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.869276
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 101 = 0.718603 pixels
  Position = (391.6, 203.2) = 15 57 54.05 63 45 33.2
  Extent = 6.2 (2.8-22.5)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 42.8 +/- 49.7
  Background counts = 2426.5
  Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.03
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability