[Tue Jun 26 07:17:32 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (359.1, 100.3) = 17 25 45.27 2 6 35.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 686.6 +/- 31.0
  Background counts = 9.0
  Rate = 0.07 +/- 0.003

[Tue Jun 26 07:17:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 15.02'
[Tue Jun 26 07:19:01 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 26 07:19:01 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.94"
[Tue Jun 26 07:19:01 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 54, mask sum = 34, frac = 0.619
[Tue Jun 26 07:19:01 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 13.94"
[Tue Jun 26 07:55:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 26 07:55:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Tue Jun 26 07:55:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 26 07:55:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Tue Jun 26 07:55:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 26 07:55:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 26 07:55:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Tue Jun 26 07:55:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 26 07:55:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Tue Jun 26 07:55:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 26 08:52:23 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2350.940000, observed total counts = 757.000000
[Tue Jun 26 08:52:23 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 23
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 26 08:52:23 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 26 08:52:23 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 26 08:52:23 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 26 08:52:23 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 26 08:52:23 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 26 08:52:36 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 26 08:52:36 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.94"
[Tue Jun 26 08:52:36 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 54, mask sum = 34, frac = 0.619
[Tue Jun 26 08:52:36 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 1, mean size = 13.94"
[Tue Jun 26 09:25:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 26 09:25:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.csv
[Tue Jun 26 09:25:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 26 09:25:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.csv
[Tue Jun 26 09:25:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 26 09:25:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 26 09:25:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Tue Jun 26 09:25:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 26 09:25:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Tue Jun 26 09:25:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 26 10:45:23 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1575.150000, observed total counts = 757.000000
[Tue Jun 26 10:45:23 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 23
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 26 10:45:23 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 26 10:45:23 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 26 10:45:23 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 26 10:45:23 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 26 10:45:23 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 26 10:45:46 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(31190.314514, 8675.972733, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Jun 26 10:45:46 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23_src.reg
[Tue Jun 26 10:45:46 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (322, 63) - (397, 138)
[Tue Jun 26 10:45:46 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(31190.314514, 8675.972733, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Jun 26 10:45:46 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23.gif
[Tue Jun 26 11:00:29 2012] Mean detx,y = (-3235.35, -16446.71) 
[Tue Jun 26 11:00:33 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Tue Jun 26 11:01:05 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Tue Jun 26 11:01:06 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue Jun 26 11:01:06 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23_bgd.pi.gz
[Tue Jun 26 11:32:21 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Tue Jun 26 11:32:21 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Tue Jun 26 12:57:27 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Tue Jun 26 12:57:27 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue Jun 26 12:57:28 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Tue Jun 26 12:57:28 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0693, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0067340401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23.arf
[Tue Jun 26 12:57:28 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Tue Jun 26 12:57:28 2012] Updating source flux to 7e-13
[Tue Jun 26 12:58:52 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting