[Thu May 2 10:12:26 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (227.5, 369.8) = 3 29 30.36 31 19 3.4 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 52.1 +/- 11.5 Background counts = 26.4 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004 [Thu May 2 10:12:26 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.29' [Thu May 2 10:12:50 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.07 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu May 2 10:12:50 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.07" [Thu May 2 10:12:50 2013] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.946 [Thu May 2 10:12:50 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 35 for pass 0, mean size = 10.07" [Thu May 2 10:12:51 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0065820101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src35.ximg exists [Thu May 2 10:12:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0065820101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src35.csv [Thu May 2 10:12:51 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0065820101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src35_1.ximg exists [Thu May 2 10:12:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0065820101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src35.csv [Thu May 2 10:12:51 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0065820101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src35_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0065820101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src35.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu May 2 10:12:51 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0065820101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src35.ximg exists [Thu May 2 10:12:51 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0065820101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src35_1.ximg exists [Thu May 2 10:12:51 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0065820101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src35 appears to have run properly [Thu May 2 10:13:03 2013] Warning, spatial fit 35 centroid is now closest to src. 22 [Thu May 2 10:13:03 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu May 2 10:13:03 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu May 2 10:13:03 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Thu May 2 10:13:03 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Thu May 2 10:13:03 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Thu May 2 10:13:20 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.07 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu May 2 10:13:20 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.07" [Thu May 2 10:13:20 2013] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.946 [Thu May 2 10:13:20 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 35 for pass 1, mean size = 10.07" [Thu May 2 10:13:21 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0065820101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src35.ximg exists [Thu May 2 10:13:21 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0065820101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src35_1.ximg exists [Thu May 2 10:13:21 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0065820101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src35 appears to have run properly [Thu May 2 10:13:21 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0065820101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src35.ximg exists [Thu May 2 10:13:21 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0065820101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src35_1.ximg exists [Thu May 2 10:13:21 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0065820101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src35 appears to have run properly [Thu May 2 10:13:33 2013] Source 20 is offset by 2.351203 and 8.596167 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.146667 x 1.146667, not incorporating fit results [Thu May 2 10:13:33 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 330.297000, observed total counts = 330.000000 [Thu May 2 10:13:33 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 20 = 0.254323 pixels [Thu May 2 10:13:33 2013] 327.914500 total counts/ 299.013000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.671381 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 20 = 0.254323 pixels Position = (227.3, 369.9) = 3 29 30.44 31 19 3.1 Extent = 5.8 (2.5-8.4)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 28.9 +/- 18.1 Background counts = 299.0 Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0004 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability