[Tue Jul 10 03:02:07 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (295.1, 232.2) = 0 41 49.18 -9 27 56.3 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 73.3 +/- 11.8 Background counts = 18.4 Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.001 [Tue Jul 10 03:02:07 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.81' [Tue Jul 10 06:14:32 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jul 10 06:14:32 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.83" [Tue Jul 10 06:14:32 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.937 [Tue Jul 10 06:14:32 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 20 for pass 0, mean size = 8.83" [Tue Jul 10 07:32:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0065140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.ximg exists [Tue Jul 10 07:32:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0065140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.csv [Tue Jul 10 07:32:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0065140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 10 07:32:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0065140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.csv [Tue Jul 10 07:32:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0065140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0065140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 10 07:32:51 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0065140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.ximg exists [Tue Jul 10 07:32:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0065140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.csv [Tue Jul 10 07:32:51 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0065140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 10 07:32:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0065140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.csv [Tue Jul 10 07:32:51 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0065140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0065140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 10 07:33:17 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 556.551000, observed total counts = 397.000000 [Tue Jul 10 07:33:17 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 33 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Tue Jul 10 07:33:17 2012] Source 33 is offset by 3.168228 and 2.592916 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.005890 x 1.005890, not incorporating fit results [Tue Jul 10 07:33:17 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Jul 10 07:33:17 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Jul 10 07:33:17 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Jul 10 07:33:17 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Jul 10 07:33:17 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Jul 10 09:45:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jul 10 09:45:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.83" [Tue Jul 10 09:45:10 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.937 [Tue Jul 10 09:45:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 1, mean size = 8.83" [Tue Jul 10 11:05:28 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0065140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg exists [Tue Jul 10 11:05:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0065140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv [Tue Jul 10 11:05:28 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0065140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 10 11:05:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0065140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv [Tue Jul 10 11:05:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0065140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0065140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 10 11:05:28 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0065140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists [Tue Jul 10 11:05:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0065140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv [Tue Jul 10 11:05:28 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0065140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 10 11:05:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0065140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv [Tue Jul 10 11:05:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0065140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0065140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 10 11:05:46 2012] Warning: source 17 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 33 at 13.077745 pixels away [Tue Jul 10 11:05:46 2012] Warning: source 23 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 33 at 23.928123 pixels away [Tue Jul 10 11:05:46 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Jul 10 11:05:46 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Jul 10 11:05:46 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Jul 10 11:05:46 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Jul 10 11:05:46 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Jul 10 11:05:46 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9