[Thu Jun 21 22:41:36 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (349.5, 285.3) = 16 9 14.44 54 31 52.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 170.8 +/- 27.2
  Background counts = 271.0
  Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.006

[Thu Jun 21 22:41:38 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.82'
[Thu Jun 21 22:48:17 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.34 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun 21 22:48:17 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.34"
[Thu Jun 21 22:48:17 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.070
[Thu Jun 21 22:48:17 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 72 for pass 0, mean size = 8.34"
[Fri Jun 22 06:51:50 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0059751801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src72.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 22 06:51:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0059751801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src72.csv
[Fri Jun 22 06:51:50 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0059751801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src72_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 22 06:51:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0059751801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src72.csv
[Fri Jun 22 06:51:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0059751801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src72_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0059751801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src72.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 22 06:51:53 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0059751801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src72.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 22 06:51:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0059751801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src72.csv
[Fri Jun 22 06:51:53 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0059751801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src72_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 22 06:51:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0059751801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src72.csv
[Fri Jun 22 06:51:53 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0059751801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src72_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0059751801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src72.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 22 07:01:08 2012] Warning, spatial fit 72 centroid is now closest to src. 69
[Fri Jun 22 07:01:08 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 22 07:01:08 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 22 07:01:08 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 22 07:01:08 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 22 07:01:08 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun 22 07:01:08 2012] Source is confused with source 65
[Fri Jun 22 07:01:24 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.34 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 22 07:01:24 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.34"
[Fri Jun 22 07:01:24 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.070
[Fri Jun 22 07:01:24 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 69 for pass 1, mean size = 8.34"
[Fri Jun 22 16:05:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0059751801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 22 16:05:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0059751801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.csv
[Fri Jun 22 16:05:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0059751801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 22 16:05:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0059751801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.csv
[Fri Jun 22 16:05:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0059751801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0059751801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 22 16:05:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0059751801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 22 16:05:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0059751801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.csv
[Fri Jun 22 16:05:27 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0059751801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 22 16:05:27 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0059751801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.csv
[Fri Jun 22 16:05:27 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0059751801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0059751801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 22 16:16:11 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 399.312000, observed total counts = 375.000000
[Fri Jun 22 16:16:11 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 72 = 1.125763 pixels
[Fri Jun 22 16:16:11 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 69 to 62
[Fri Jun 22 16:16:11 2012] 190.966500 total counts/ 177.167000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.036745
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 72 = 1.125763 pixels
  Position = (350.4, 285.9) = 16 9 13.96 54 31 54.5
  Extent = 4.4 (2.1-9.8)", rotation angle = 287 (55-90) degrees
  Source counts = 13.8 +/- 13.8
  Background counts = 177.2
  Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.03
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability