[Sun Jul 29 10:15:51 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (391.0, 316.5) = 14 3 43.10 -33 59 16.0 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 41.1 +/- 10.0 Background counts = 17.8 Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0009 [Sun Jul 29 10:15:52 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.83' [Sun Jul 29 11:33:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.85 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jul 29 11:33:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.85" [Sun Jul 29 11:33:04 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.982 [Sun Jul 29 11:33:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 0, mean size = 9.85" [Sun Jul 29 12:12:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0058940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg exists [Sun Jul 29 12:12:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0058940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv [Sun Jul 29 12:12:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0058940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg exists [Sun Jul 29 12:12:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0058940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv [Sun Jul 29 12:12:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0058940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0058940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jul 29 12:12:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0058940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists [Sun Jul 29 12:12:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0058940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists [Sun Jul 29 12:12:19 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0058940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12 appears to have run properly [Sun Jul 29 12:12:39 2012] Source 15 is offset by -6.743132 and -6.802964 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.541972 x 1.541972, not incorporating fit results [Sun Jul 29 12:12:39 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Jul 29 12:12:39 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Jul 29 12:12:39 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Jul 29 12:12:39 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Jul 29 12:12:39 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Jul 29 13:28:42 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.85 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jul 29 13:28:42 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.85" [Sun Jul 29 13:28:42 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.982 [Sun Jul 29 13:28:42 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 1, mean size = 9.85" [Sun Jul 29 13:57:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0058940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg exists [Sun Jul 29 13:57:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0058940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg exists [Sun Jul 29 13:57:59 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0058940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12 appears to have run properly [Sun Jul 29 13:57:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0058940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists [Sun Jul 29 13:57:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0058940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists [Sun Jul 29 13:57:59 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0058940301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12 appears to have run properly [Sun Jul 29 13:58:16 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 305.568000, observed total counts = 304.000000 [Sun Jul 29 13:58:16 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 15 = 0.444696 pixels [Sun Jul 29 13:58:16 2012] 315.436200 total counts/ 301.312000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.813684 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 15 = 0.444696 pixels Position = (390.8, 316.9) = 14 3 43.17 -33 59 15.2 Extent = 2.8 (2.5-5.3)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 14.1 +/- 17.8 Background counts = 301.3 Rate = 0.0007 +/- 0.0009 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability