[Sat Jul 14 07:29:03 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (453.7, 323.1) = 12 52 2.30 -29 23 35.1 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 91.1 +/- 16.9 Background counts = 60.5 Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003 [Sat Jul 14 07:29:03 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.40' [Sat Jul 14 07:34:12 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.13 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Jul 14 07:34:12 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.13" [Sat Jul 14 07:34:12 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 43, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.971 [Sat Jul 14 07:34:12 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 61 for pass 0, mean size = 12.13" [Sat Jul 14 14:28:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.ximg exists [Sat Jul 14 14:28:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.csv [Sat Jul 14 14:28:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61_1.ximg exists [Sat Jul 14 14:28:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.csv [Sat Jul 14 14:28:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Jul 14 14:28:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61.ximg exists [Sat Jul 14 14:28:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61.csv [Sat Jul 14 14:28:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61_1.ximg exists [Sat Jul 14 14:28:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61.csv [Sat Jul 14 14:28:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Jul 14 19:29:47 2012] Warning: source 61 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 63 at 10.968338 pixels away [Sat Jul 14 19:29:47 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Jul 14 19:29:47 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Jul 14 19:29:47 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Jul 14 19:29:47 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Jul 14 19:29:47 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat Jul 14 19:30:31 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.13 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Jul 14 19:30:31 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.13" [Sat Jul 14 19:30:31 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 43, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.971 [Sat Jul 14 19:30:31 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 52 for pass 1, mean size = 12.13" [Sun Jul 15 23:29:53 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src52.ximg exists [Sun Jul 15 23:29:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src52.csv [Sun Jul 15 23:29:53 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src52_1.ximg exists [Sun Jul 15 23:29:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src52.csv [Sun Jul 15 23:29:53 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src52_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src52.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jul 15 23:29:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src52.ximg exists [Sun Jul 15 23:29:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src52.csv [Sun Jul 15 23:29:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src52_1.ximg exists [Sun Jul 15 23:29:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src52.csv [Sun Jul 15 23:29:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src52_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src52.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jul 16 03:50:07 2012] Warning: source 52 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 63 at 15.872008 pixels away [Mon Jul 16 03:50:07 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Jul 16 03:50:07 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Jul 16 03:50:07 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Jul 16 03:50:07 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Jul 16 03:50:07 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Jul 16 03:50:07 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0