[Sat Jul 14 07:30:17 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (141.7, 258.2) = 12 53 46.20 -29 28 20.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 62.1 +/- 11.3
  Background counts = 19.1
  Rate = 0.0009 +/- 0.0002

[Sat Jul 14 07:30:17 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.73'
[Sat Jul 14 16:41:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.29 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jul 14 16:41:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.29"
[Sat Jul 14 16:41:52 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 44, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.107
[Sat Jul 14 16:41:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 58 for pass 0, mean size = 12.29"
[Sat Jul 14 19:29:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 14 19:29:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 14 19:29:18 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58 appears to have run properly
[Sat Jul 14 19:29:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 14 19:29:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58.csv
[Sat Jul 14 19:29:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 14 19:29:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58.csv
[Sat Jul 14 19:29:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jul 14 19:30:10 2012] Warning: source 58 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 54 at 15.592219 pixels away
[Sat Jul 14 19:30:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jul 14 19:30:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jul 14 19:30:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jul 14 19:30:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jul 14 19:30:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jul 15 23:54:42 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.29 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jul 15 23:54:42 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.29"
[Sun Jul 15 23:54:42 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 44, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.107
[Sun Jul 15 23:54:42 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 57 for pass 1, mean size = 12.29"
[Mon Jul 16 03:49:49 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 16 03:49:49 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 16 03:49:49 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jul 16 03:49:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 16 03:49:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul 16 03:49:50 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jul 16 03:50:22 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 249.257000, observed total counts = 256.000000
[Mon Jul 16 03:50:22 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 54 = 0.435107 pixels
[Mon Jul 16 03:50:22 2012] 247.192000 total counts/ 233.212000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.915444
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 54 = 0.435107 pixels
  Position = (141.7, 257.8) = 12 53 46.21 -29 28 21.0
  Extent = 2.1" x 2.1", rotation angle = 25
  Source counts = 14.0 +/- 15.7
  Background counts = 233.2
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 0.0002
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability