[Sat Jul 14 07:30:16 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (123.3, 338.8) = 12 53 52.27 -29 22 27.6 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 48.5 +/- 10.5 Background counts = 17.5 Rate = 0.0007 +/- 0.0002 [Sat Jul 14 07:30:17 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.03' [Sat Jul 14 16:41:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Jul 14 16:41:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.94" [Sat Jul 14 16:41:52 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 48, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.014 [Sat Jul 14 16:41:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 65 for pass 0, mean size = 12.94" [Sat Jul 14 19:29:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65.ximg exists [Sat Jul 14 19:29:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65_1.ximg exists [Sat Jul 14 19:29:19 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65 appears to have run properly [Sat Jul 14 19:29:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src65.ximg exists [Sat Jul 14 19:29:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src65_1.ximg exists [Sat Jul 14 19:29:20 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src65 appears to have run properly [Sat Jul 14 19:30:10 2012] Warning: source 65 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 45 at 17.168648 pixels away [Sat Jul 14 19:30:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Jul 14 19:30:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Jul 14 19:30:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Jul 14 19:30:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Jul 14 19:30:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Jul 15 23:54:42 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jul 15 23:54:42 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.94" [Sun Jul 15 23:54:42 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 48, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.014 [Sun Jul 15 23:54:42 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 64 for pass 1, mean size = 12.94" [Mon Jul 16 03:49:49 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.ximg exists [Mon Jul 16 03:49:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.csv [Mon Jul 16 03:49:49 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64_1.ximg exists [Mon Jul 16 03:49:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.csv [Mon Jul 16 03:49:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jul 16 03:49:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64.ximg exists [Mon Jul 16 03:49:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64_1.ximg exists [Mon Jul 16 03:49:50 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0057740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64 appears to have run properly [Mon Jul 16 03:50:23 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 275.990000, observed total counts = 276.000000 [Mon Jul 16 03:50:23 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 45 = 0.381267 pixels [Mon Jul 16 03:50:23 2012] 273.727600 total counts/ 247.456000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.670081 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 45 = 0.381267 pixels Position = (123.6, 339.1) = 12 53 52.18 -29 22 27.3 Extent = 4.0 (3.2-6.2)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 26.3 +/- 16.5 Background counts = 247.5 Rate = 0.0004 +/- 0.0002 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability