[Thu May 31 10:20:17 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (334.4, 274.7) = 14 49 20.21 8 56 38.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 43.0 +/- 9.9
  Background counts = 16.7
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003

[Thu May 31 10:20:17 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.12'
[Thu May 31 12:54:58 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.99 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 31 12:54:58 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.99"
[Thu May 31 12:54:58 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.145
[Thu May 31 12:54:58 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 32 for pass 0, mean size = 7.99"
[Thu May 31 13:40:46 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0057560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src32.ximg exists
[Thu May 31 13:40:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0057560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src32.csv
[Thu May 31 13:40:46 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0057560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src32_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 31 13:40:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0057560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src32.csv
[Thu May 31 13:40:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0057560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src32_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0057560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src32.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 31 13:40:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0057560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src32.ximg exists
[Thu May 31 13:40:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0057560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src32_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 31 13:40:47 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0057560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src32 appears to have run properly
[Thu May 31 13:41:09 2012] Source 29 is offset by -6.988340 and 5.804695 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.918423 x 0.918423, not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 31 13:41:09 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 31 13:41:09 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 31 13:41:09 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 31 13:41:09 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 31 13:41:09 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May 31 15:54:05 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.99 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 31 15:54:05 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.99"
[Thu May 31 15:54:05 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.145
[Thu May 31 15:54:05 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 32 for pass 1, mean size = 7.99"
[Thu May 31 16:40:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0057560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src32.ximg exists
[Thu May 31 16:40:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0057560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src32_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 31 16:40:52 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0057560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src32 appears to have run properly
[Thu May 31 16:40:53 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0057560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src32.ximg exists
[Thu May 31 16:40:53 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0057560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src32_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 31 16:40:53 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0057560301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src32 appears to have run properly
[Thu May 31 16:41:17 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 181.935000, observed total counts = 173.000000
[Thu May 31 16:41:17 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 29 = 0.490644 pixels
[Thu May 31 16:41:17 2012] 181.760500 total counts/ 169.160000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.968811
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 29 = 0.490644 pixels
  Position = (334.6, 275.1) = 14 49 20.15 8 56 39.7
  Extent = 2.0 (2.0-4.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 12.6 +/- 13.5
  Background counts = 169.2
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 0.0003
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability