[Mon May 13 10:36:20 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (237.6, 295.0) = 12 46 53.93 2 20 10.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 45.4 +/- 9.7
  Background counts = 15.1
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.001

[Mon May 13 10:36:20 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.42'
[Mon May 13 11:55:15 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.64 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 13 11:55:15 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.64"
[Mon May 13 11:55:15 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.011
[Mon May 13 11:55:15 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 8.64"
[Mon May 13 12:11:32 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0051760101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists
[Mon May 13 12:11:32 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0051760101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Mon May 13 12:11:32 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0051760101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 13 12:11:32 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0051760101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Mon May 13 12:11:32 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0051760101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0051760101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 13 12:11:33 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0051760101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Mon May 13 12:11:33 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0051760101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Mon May 13 12:11:33 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0051760101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 13 12:11:33 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0051760101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Mon May 13 12:11:33 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0051760101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0051760101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 13 12:11:42 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 181.097000, observed total counts = 164.000000
[Mon May 13 12:11:42 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 13 12:11:42 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 13 12:11:42 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 13 12:11:42 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 13 12:11:42 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 13 12:11:42 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 13 13:23:09 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.64 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 13 13:23:09 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.64"
[Mon May 13 13:23:09 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.011
[Mon May 13 13:23:09 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 8.64"
[Mon May 13 13:37:40 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0051760101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists
[Mon May 13 13:37:40 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0051760101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Mon May 13 13:37:40 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0051760101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 13 13:37:40 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0051760101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Mon May 13 13:37:40 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0051760101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0051760101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 13 13:37:40 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0051760101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Mon May 13 13:37:40 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0051760101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Mon May 13 13:37:40 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0051760101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 13 13:37:40 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0051760101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Mon May 13 13:37:40 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0051760101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0051760101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 13 13:37:49 2013] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 9 at 12.367211 pixels away
[Mon May 13 13:37:49 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 13 13:37:49 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 13 13:37:49 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 13 13:37:49 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 13 13:37:49 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 13 13:37:49 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9