[Fri Jun 8 10:19:06 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (386.1, 261.2) = 5 24 42.56 -33 46 36.6 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 126.1 +/- 18.9 Background counts = 96.5 Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.002 [Fri Jun 8 10:19:06 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.91' [Fri Jun 8 10:21:37 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.88 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Jun 8 10:21:37 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.88" [Fri Jun 8 10:21:37 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 35, frac = 1.139 [Fri Jun 8 10:21:37 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 9.88" [Fri Jun 8 10:43:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0050150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists [Fri Jun 8 10:43:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0050150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Fri Jun 8 10:43:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0050150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists [Fri Jun 8 10:43:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0050150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Fri Jun 8 10:43:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0050150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0050150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Jun 8 10:43:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0050150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Fri Jun 8 10:43:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0050150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv [Fri Jun 8 10:43:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0050150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Fri Jun 8 10:43:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0050150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv [Fri Jun 8 10:43:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0050150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0050150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Jun 8 11:15:53 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 9 at 13.507568 pixels away [Fri Jun 8 11:15:53 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Jun 8 11:15:53 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Jun 8 11:15:53 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Jun 8 11:15:53 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Jun 8 11:15:53 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Jun 8 11:16:08 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.88 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Jun 8 11:16:08 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.88" [Fri Jun 8 11:16:08 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 35, frac = 1.139 [Fri Jun 8 11:16:08 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 9.88" [Fri Jun 8 11:37:11 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0050150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists [Fri Jun 8 11:37:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0050150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv [Fri Jun 8 11:37:11 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0050150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists [Fri Jun 8 11:37:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0050150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv [Fri Jun 8 11:37:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0050150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0050150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Jun 8 11:37:11 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0050150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Fri Jun 8 11:37:11 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0050150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Fri Jun 8 11:37:11 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0050150101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly [Fri Jun 8 12:10:47 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 397.425000, observed total counts = 365.000000 [Fri Jun 8 12:10:47 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.192195 pixels [Fri Jun 8 12:10:47 2012] 393.739000 total counts/ 361.883000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.674585 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.192195 pixels Position = (386.1, 261.0) = 5 24 42.57 -33 46 37.9 Extent = 5.0 (2.9-7.7)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 31.9 +/- 19.8 Background counts = 361.9 Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.004 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability