[Sun Jul 15 15:16:04 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (220.2, 385.9) = 2 16 27.80 -73 54 15.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 254.5 +/- 20.7
  Background counts = 30.9
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.001

[Sun Jul 15 15:16:05 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.51'
[Sun Jul 15 15:18:19 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.68 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jul 15 15:18:19 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Sun Jul 15 15:18:19 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.68"
[Sun Jul 15 15:18:19 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.030
[Sun Jul 15 15:18:19 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 1 for pass 0, mean size = 10.68"
[Sun Jul 15 15:57:48 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 15:57:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src1.csv
[Sun Jul 15 15:57:48 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src1_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 15:57:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src1.csv
[Sun Jul 15 15:57:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src1_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src1.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jul 15 15:57:48 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 15:57:48 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src1_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 15:57:48 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src1 appears to have run properly
[Sun Jul 15 16:16:58 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 403.143000, observed total counts = 370.000000
[Sun Jul 15 16:16:58 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 1 = 0.184369 pixels
[Sun Jul 15 16:16:58 2012] 403.442000 total counts/ 256.401000 bgd. counts: snr = 9.182873
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 1 = 0.184369 pixels
  Position = (220.1, 385.7) = 2 16 27.93 -73 54 16.8
  Extent = 5.4 (4.7-6.2)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 147.0 +/- 20.1
  Background counts = 256.4
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.001
[Sun Jul 15 16:16:58 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jul 15 16:16:58 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jul 15 16:16:58 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sun Jul 15 16:16:58 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jul 15 16:16:58 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jul 15 16:17:08 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jul 15 16:17:08 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 5.43"
[Sun Jul 15 16:17:08 2012] source mask rpix=1.2, npix_max = 12, mask sum = 12, frac = 0.982
[Sun Jul 15 16:17:08 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 1 for pass 1, mean size = 5.43"
[Sun Jul 15 16:59:06 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 16:59:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src1.csv
[Sun Jul 15 16:59:06 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src1_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 16:59:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src1.csv
[Sun Jul 15 16:59:06 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src1_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src1.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jul 15 16:59:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 16:59:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1.csv
[Sun Jul 15 16:59:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 16:59:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1.csv
[Sun Jul 15 16:59:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jul 15 17:18:32 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 330.315000, observed total counts = 299.000000
[Sun Jul 15 17:18:32 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 1
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jul 15 17:18:32 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jul 15 17:18:32 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jul 15 17:18:32 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sun Jul 15 17:18:32 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jul 15 17:18:32 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jul 15 17:18:41 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(19099.269560, 33511.109800, 325.788609, 325.788609, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jul 15 17:18:41 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src1_src.reg
[Sun Jul 15 17:18:41 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (201, 367) - (239, 404)
[Sun Jul 15 17:18:41 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(19099.269560, 33511.109800, 542.981016, 1085.962031, X, Y)
[Sun Jul 15 17:18:41 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src1.gif
[Sun Jul 15 17:18:47 2012] Mean detx,y = (9111.91, 2334.35) 
[Sun Jul 15 17:18:49 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sun Jul 15 17:19:06 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sun Jul 15 17:19:06 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src1_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sun Jul 15 17:19:06 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src1_bgd.pi.gz
[Sun Jul 15 18:07:27 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sun Jul 15 18:07:27 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src1_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sun Jul 15 18:07:27 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sun Jul 15 18:07:27 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00939, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src1.arf
[Sun Jul 15 18:07:27 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sun Jul 15 18:07:27 2012] Updating source flux to 4.1e-14
[Sun Jul 15 18:08:12 2012] Flag p found in src. 1 procflags, skipping spectral fitting
[Sun Jul 15 18:08:31 2012] Reading fit data from xmm0049150301/analysis//spectral/fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src1_pl.csv
[Sun Jul 15 18:08:31 2012] Spectral fit parameter nH value = 5.9596e+13
[Sun Jul 15 18:08:31 2012] Spectral fit parameter PhoIndex value = 1.88071
[Sun Jul 15 18:08:31 2012] Failed to get F(0.3-8.0) from xmm0049150301/analysis//spectral/fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src1_pl.csv, possibly due to different flux energy range selected
[Sun Jul 15 18:08:31 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sun Jul 15 18:08:31 2012] Using Nh = 6e+13, photon index=1.88, rate=0.00939, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0049150301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src1.arf
[Sun Jul 15 18:08:31 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sun Jul 15 18:08:31 2012] Updating source flux to 3.9e-14