[Sun Jun 16 00:52:05 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (222.2, 122.9) = 10 38 31.62 41 32 36.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 203.9 +/- 36.0
  Background counts = 366.5
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Sun Jun 16 00:52:10 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.87'
[Sun Jun 16 01:00:34 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.37 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 16 01:00:34 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Sun Jun 16 01:00:34 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.37"
[Sun Jun 16 01:00:34 2013] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 51, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.960
[Sun Jun 16 01:00:34 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 0, mean size = 13.37"
[Sun Jun 16 06:32:40 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 16 06:32:40 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv
[Sun Jun 16 06:32:40 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 16 06:32:40 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv
[Sun Jun 16 06:32:40 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 16 06:32:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 16 06:32:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Sun Jun 16 06:32:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 16 06:32:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Sun Jun 16 06:32:42 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 16 06:58:58 2013] Warning: source 18 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 20 at 17.148170 pixels away
[Sun Jun 16 06:58:58 2013] Source 20 is offset by 7.354121 and 5.788480 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.548648 x 1.548648, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun 16 06:58:58 2013] Source 20 is offset by 3.986098 and -1.885152 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 3.801412 x 3.801412, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun 16 06:58:58 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun 16 06:58:58 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun 16 06:58:58 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun 16 06:58:58 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun 16 06:58:58 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun 16 06:59:18 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.37 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 16 06:59:18 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.37"
[Sun Jun 16 06:59:18 2013] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 51, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.960
[Sun Jun 16 06:59:18 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 1, mean size = 13.37"
[Sun Jun 16 12:25:46 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 16 12:25:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Sun Jun 16 12:25:46 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 16 12:25:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Sun Jun 16 12:25:46 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 16 12:25:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 16 12:25:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Sun Jun 16 12:25:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 16 12:25:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Sun Jun 16 12:25:47 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 16 12:41:42 2013] Warning: source 16 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 20 at 14.802711 pixels away
[Sun Jun 16 12:41:42 2013] Source 20 is offset by 7.354121 and 5.788480 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.548648 x 1.548648, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun 16 12:41:43 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun 16 12:41:43 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun 16 12:41:43 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun 16 12:41:43 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun 16 12:41:43 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun 16 12:42:03 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(19286.668549, 10643.737740, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jun 16 12:42:03 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src20_src.reg
[Sun Jun 16 12:42:03 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (185, 85) - (260, 160)
[Sun Jun 16 12:42:03 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(19286.668549, 10643.737740, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17217.963974, 11021.653946, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17620.511551, 11182.978836, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18178.002655, 11202.736237, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(16507.875061, 11520.819366, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jun 16 12:42:03 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src20.gif
[Sun Jun 16 13:00:54 2013] Mean detx,y = (-14464.11, 11242.00) 
[Sun Jun 16 13:00:56 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sun Jun 16 13:01:36 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sun Jun 16 13:01:36 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src20_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sun Jun 16 13:01:36 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src20_bgd.pi.gz
[Sun Jun 16 13:58:37 2013] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sun Jun 16 13:58:37 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Sun Jun 16 14:41:49 2013] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sun Jun 16 14:41:49 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src20_src_b10.pi.gz = 1995.00
[Sun Jun 16 14:41:49 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src20_bgd.pi.gz = 6825.00
[Sun Jun 16 14:41:49 2013] Got source and background scale factors 1198790.000000, 4028539.000000
[Sun Jun 16 14:41:49 2013] User source parameters:
  Position = (222.2, 122.9) = 10 38 31.62 41 32 36.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0
  Source aperture counts = -35.9 +/- 45.7
  Background aperture counts = 2030.9
  Rate = -0.004 +/- 0.005

[Sun Jun 16 14:41:49 2013] Updating counts from extracted products
[Sun Jun 16 14:41:49 2013] Set source signif. to -35.95/45.07 = -0.80
[Sun Jun 16 14:41:58 2013] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sun Jun 16 14:41:58 2013] Using photon index=1.80, rate=-0.00427, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src20.arf
[Sun Jun 16 14:41:58 2013] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sun Jun 16 14:41:58 2013] Updated flux is not positive, keeping original flux
[Sun Jun 16 14:42:07 2013] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting
[Sun Jun 16 14:42:13 2013] xmm0046940101/analysis//spectral/fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src20_pl.csv not found, spectral fit skipped or did not complete