[Sun Jun 16 00:52:05 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (178.0, 251.1) = 10 38 48.87 41 41 55.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 253.4 +/- 36.9
  Background counts = 467.8
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Sun Jun 16 00:52:10 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.38'
[Sun Jun 16 01:00:34 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.12 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 16 01:00:34 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.12"
[Sun Jun 16 01:00:34 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.964
[Sun Jun 16 01:00:34 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 15 for pass 0, mean size = 11.12"
[Sun Jun 16 06:32:40 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 16 06:32:40 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.csv
[Sun Jun 16 06:32:40 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 16 06:32:40 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.csv
[Sun Jun 16 06:32:40 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 16 06:32:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 16 06:32:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.csv
[Sun Jun 16 06:32:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 16 06:32:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.csv
[Sun Jun 16 06:32:42 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 16 06:58:58 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 3920.930000, observed total counts = 3011.000000
[Sun Jun 16 06:58:58 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 17
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun 16 06:58:58 2013] Source 17 is offset by -4.535262 and 0.518644 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.974248 x 1.974248, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun 16 06:58:58 2013] Source 17 is offset by -1.650963 and 0.721863 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.379595 x 9.892828, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun 16 06:58:58 2013] Warning, spatial fit 15 centroid is now closest to src. 1
[Sun Jun 16 06:58:58 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun 16 06:58:58 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun 16 06:58:58 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun 16 06:58:58 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun 16 06:58:58 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun 16 06:58:58 2013] Source is confused with source 2
[Sun Jun 16 06:59:18 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.12 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 16 06:59:18 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.12"
[Sun Jun 16 06:59:18 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.964
[Sun Jun 16 06:59:18 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 1, mean size = 11.12"
[Sun Jun 16 12:25:46 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 16 12:25:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv
[Sun Jun 16 12:25:46 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 16 12:25:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv
[Sun Jun 16 12:25:46 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 16 12:25:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 16 12:25:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Sun Jun 16 12:25:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 16 12:25:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Sun Jun 16 12:25:47 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0046940101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 16 12:41:42 2013] Source 17 is offset by -4.441676 and 2.696759 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.407324 x 1.407324, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun 16 12:41:42 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 4256.270000, observed total counts = 4013.000000
[Sun Jun 16 12:41:42 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 17 = 1.942911 pixels
[Sun Jun 16 12:41:42 2013] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 13 to 9
[Sun Jun 16 12:41:42 2013] 4257.716200 total counts/ 4166.170000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.418312
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 17 = 1.942911 pixels
  Position = (179.8, 250.2) = 10 38 48.20 41 41 51.2
  Extent = 17.6 (9.6-21.6)" x 2.7 (2.7-5.5)", rotation angle = 27 (16-52) degrees
  Source counts = 91.5 +/- 65.3
  Background counts = 4166.2
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.008
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability