[Fri May 17 22:20:24 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (217.2, 455.8) = 11 51 6.76 1 55 43.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 141.7 +/- 16.3
  Background counts = 30.5
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0004

[Fri May 17 22:20:26 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.84'
[Fri May 17 22:21:00 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.85 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 17 22:21:00 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.85"
[Fri May 17 22:21:00 2013] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 47, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.027
[Fri May 17 22:21:00 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 12.85"
[Fri May 17 22:21:01 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0044740201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Fri May 17 22:21:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0044740201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Fri May 17 22:21:01 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0044740201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 17 22:21:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0044740201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Fri May 17 22:21:01 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0044740201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0044740201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 17 22:21:02 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0044740201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Fri May 17 22:21:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0044740201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Fri May 17 22:21:02 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0044740201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 17 22:21:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0044740201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Fri May 17 22:21:02 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0044740201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0044740201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 17 22:21:23 2013] Source 9 is offset by 3.110077 and 3.618538 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.511260 x 1.511260, not incorporating fit results
[Fri May 17 22:21:23 2013] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 2
[Fri May 17 22:21:23 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May 17 22:21:23 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May 17 22:21:23 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri May 17 22:21:23 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May 17 22:21:23 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May 17 22:21:55 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.85 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 17 22:21:55 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.85"
[Fri May 17 22:21:55 2013] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 47, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.027
[Fri May 17 22:21:55 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 1, mean size = 12.85"
[Fri May 17 22:21:57 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0044740201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg exists
[Fri May 17 22:21:57 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0044740201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.csv
[Fri May 17 22:21:57 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0044740201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 17 22:21:57 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0044740201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.csv
[Fri May 17 22:21:57 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0044740201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0044740201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 17 22:21:58 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0044740201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists
[Fri May 17 22:21:58 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0044740201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.csv
[Fri May 17 22:21:58 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0044740201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 17 22:21:58 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0044740201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.csv
[Fri May 17 22:21:58 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0044740201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0044740201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 17 22:22:20 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 909.387000, observed total counts = 908.000000
[Fri May 17 22:22:20 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.226734 pixels
[Fri May 17 22:22:20 2013] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 8 to 2
[Fri May 17 22:22:20 2013] 897.843400 total counts/ 853.719000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.510154
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.226734 pixels
  Position = (217.3, 456.1) = 11 51 6.75 1 55 43.4
  Extent = 3.3 (3.2-4.9)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 44.1 +/- 30.0
  Background counts = 853.7
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0007
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability