[Tue Jun 12 01:32:50 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (487.7, 377.7) = 11 30 58.93 -19 51 25.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 25.7 +/- 7.3
  Background counts = 7.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005

[Tue Jun 12 01:32:50 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.88'
[Tue Jun 12 03:18:00 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.87 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 12 03:18:00 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Tue Jun 12 03:18:00 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.87"
[Tue Jun 12 03:18:00 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 54, mask sum = 46, frac = 0.846
[Tue Jun 12 03:18:00 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 13.87"
[Tue Jun 12 03:44:34 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0042341001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 12 03:44:34 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0042341001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Tue Jun 12 03:44:34 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0042341001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 12 03:44:34 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0042341001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Tue Jun 12 03:44:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0042341001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0042341001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 12 03:44:34 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0042341001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 12 03:44:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0042341001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Tue Jun 12 03:44:34 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0042341001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 12 03:44:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0042341001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Tue Jun 12 03:44:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0042341001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0042341001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 12 03:44:43 2012] Warning, spatial fit 4 centroid is now closest to src. 15
[Tue Jun 12 03:44:43 2012] Warning, spatial fit 24 centroid is now closest to src. 18
[Tue Jun 12 03:44:43 2012] Warning, spatial fit 25 centroid is now closest to src. 14
[Tue Jun 12 03:44:45 2012] Warning, spatial fit 3 centroid is now closest to src. 13
[Tue Jun 12 03:44:45 2012] Warning, spatial fit 11 centroid is now closest to src. 21
[Tue Jun 12 03:44:45 2012] Warning: source 23 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 24 at 18.459442 pixels away
[Tue Jun 12 03:44:45 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 12 03:44:45 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 12 03:44:45 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 12 03:44:45 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 12 03:44:45 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 12 05:16:35 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.87 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 12 05:16:35 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.87"
[Tue Jun 12 05:16:35 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 54, mask sum = 46, frac = 0.846
[Tue Jun 12 05:16:35 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 20 for pass 1, mean size = 13.87"
[Tue Jun 12 05:37:28 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0042341001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 12 05:37:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0042341001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.csv
[Tue Jun 12 05:37:28 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0042341001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 12 05:37:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0042341001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.csv
[Tue Jun 12 05:37:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0042341001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0042341001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 12 05:37:28 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0042341001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 12 05:37:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0042341001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Tue Jun 12 05:37:28 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0042341001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 12 05:37:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0042341001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Tue Jun 12 05:37:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0042341001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0042341001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 12 05:37:35 2012] Warning, spatial fit 19 centroid is now closest to src. 27
[Tue Jun 12 05:37:35 2012] Warning, spatial fit 22 centroid is now closest to src. 27
[Tue Jun 12 05:37:37 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 67.742300, observed total counts = 46.000000
[Tue Jun 12 05:37:37 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 24
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 12 05:37:37 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 12 05:37:37 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 12 05:37:37 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 12 05:37:37 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 12 05:37:37 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 12 05:37:37 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9