[Mon May 27 00:40:19 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (225.3, 169.3) = 5 17 19.95 -54 38 18.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 54.9 +/- 10.4
  Background counts = 14.6
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001

[Mon May 27 00:40:20 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.76'
[Mon May 27 00:40:56 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.81 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 27 00:40:56 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.81"
[Mon May 27 00:40:56 2013] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.185
[Mon May 27 00:40:56 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 11.81"
[Mon May 27 00:40:57 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 00:40:57 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Mon May 27 00:40:57 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 00:40:57 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Mon May 27 00:40:57 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 27 00:40:57 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 00:40:57 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 00:40:57 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10 appears to have run properly
[Mon May 27 00:41:16 2013] Warning: source 10 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 17 at 16.063564 pixels away
[Mon May 27 00:41:16 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 27 00:41:16 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 27 00:41:16 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 27 00:41:16 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 27 00:41:16 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 27 00:41:41 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.81 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 27 00:41:41 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.81"
[Mon May 27 00:41:41 2013] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.185
[Mon May 27 00:41:41 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 11.81"
[Mon May 27 00:41:42 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 00:41:42 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 00:41:42 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9 appears to have run properly
[Mon May 27 00:41:42 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 00:41:42 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 00:41:42 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Mon May 27 00:41:58 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 131.807000, observed total counts = 129.000000
[Mon May 27 00:41:58 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 17 = 0.514655 pixels
[Mon May 27 00:41:58 2013] 130.703300 total counts/ 108.797000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.100200
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 17 = 0.514655 pixels
  Position = (225.6, 169.7) = 5 17 19.80 -54 38 16.0
  Extent = 4.1" x 4.1", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 21.9 +/- 11.4
  Background counts = 108.8
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0008
[Mon May 27 00:41:58 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 27 00:41:58 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 27 00:41:58 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 27 00:41:58 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 27 00:41:58 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 27 00:41:58 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9