[Sun Jun 10 10:15:52 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (326.7, 305.0) = 0 43 21.25 -20 37 55.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 155.0 +/- 16.5
  Background counts = 13.7
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001

[Sun Jun 10 10:15:53 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.10'
[Sun Jun 10 13:49:35 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.48 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 10 13:49:35 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.48"
[Sun Jun 10 13:49:35 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.964
[Sun Jun 10 13:49:35 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 7.48"
[Sun Jun 10 15:45:31 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 10 15:45:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sun Jun 10 15:45:31 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 10 15:45:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sun Jun 10 15:45:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 10 15:45:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 10 15:45:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun Jun 10 15:45:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 10 15:45:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun Jun 10 15:45:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 10 15:46:10 2012] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 1
[Sun Jun 10 15:46:10 2012] Source 20 is offset by 8.504424 and -2.784759 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.851159 x 0.851159, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun 10 15:46:10 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 433.419000, observed total counts = 435.000000
[Sun Jun 10 15:46:10 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 20 = 2.084677 pixels
[Sun Jun 10 15:46:10 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 9 to 29
[Sun Jun 10 15:46:10 2012] 401.123600 total counts/ 352.992000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.561816
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 20 = 2.084677 pixels
  Position = (328.8, 304.9) = 0 43 20.61 -20 37 56.4
  Extent = 10.1 (4.9-15.7)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 48.1 +/- 20.0
  Background counts = 353.0
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.001
[Sun Jun 10 15:46:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun 10 15:46:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun 10 15:46:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sun Jun 10 15:46:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun 10 15:46:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun 10 15:46:10 2012] Source is confused with source 18
[Sun Jun 10 15:46:10 2012] Source is confused with source 35
[Sun Jun 10 18:42:10 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 10 18:42:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.10"
[Sun Jun 10 18:42:10 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.130
[Sun Jun 10 18:42:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 10.10"