[Sun Jun 10 10:15:52 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (321.4, 328.6) = 0 43 22.90 -20 36 12.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 66.9 +/- 11.6
  Background counts = 14.7
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0009

[Sun Jun 10 10:15:53 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.75'
[Sun Jun 10 13:49:35 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.80 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 10 13:49:35 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.80"
[Sun Jun 10 13:49:35 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.808
[Sun Jun 10 13:49:35 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 0, mean size = 7.80"
[Sun Jun 10 15:45:31 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 10 15:45:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Sun Jun 10 15:45:31 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 10 15:45:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Sun Jun 10 15:45:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 10 15:45:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 10 15:45:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 10 15:45:32 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17 appears to have run properly
[Sun Jun 10 15:46:10 2012] Source 15 is offset by -5.519349 and -8.300791 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 7.175724 x 7.175724, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun 10 15:46:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun 10 15:46:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun 10 15:46:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun 10 15:46:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun 10 15:46:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun 10 18:42:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.80 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 10 18:42:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.80"
[Sun Jun 10 18:42:10 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.808
[Sun Jun 10 18:42:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 1, mean size = 7.80"