[Sun Jun 10 10:14:55 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (295.9, 323.8) = 0 43 30.78 -20 36 33.7 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 44.0 +/- 9.9 Background counts = 9.6 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0008 [Sun Jun 10 10:14:56 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.85' [Sun Jun 10 11:51:40 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.35 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jun 10 11:51:40 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.35" [Sun Jun 10 11:51:40 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.834 [Sun Jun 10 11:51:40 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 7.35" [Sun Jun 10 13:49:33 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 13:49:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv [Sun Jun 10 13:49:33 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 13:49:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv [Sun Jun 10 13:49:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jun 10 13:49:34 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 13:49:34 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 13:49:34 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23 appears to have run properly [Sun Jun 10 15:46:00 2012] Warning, spatial fit 23 centroid is now closest to src. 20 [Sun Jun 10 15:46:00 2012] Source 26 is offset by -1.418367 and 7.477630 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 6.358621 x 6.358621, not incorporating fit results [Sun Jun 10 15:46:00 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Jun 10 15:46:00 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Jun 10 15:46:00 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Jun 10 15:46:00 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Jun 10 15:46:00 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Jun 10 15:46:00 2012] Source is confused with source 20 [Sun Jun 10 17:04:25 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.35 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jun 10 17:04:25 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.35" [Sun Jun 10 17:04:25 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.834 [Sun Jun 10 17:04:25 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 21 for pass 1, mean size = 7.35" [Sun Jun 10 18:42:09 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 18:42:09 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 18:42:10 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21 appears to have run properly [Sun Jun 10 18:42:10 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 18:42:10 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 18:42:10 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0042340201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21 appears to have run properly