[Mon Sep 3 05:10:32 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (308.5, 297.2) = 0 14 9.27 -30 21 52.3 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 398.9 +/- 25.8 Background counts = 49.3 Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.003 [Mon Sep 3 05:10:33 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.73' [Mon Sep 3 05:12:20 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.79 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Sep 3 05:12:20 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.79" [Mon Sep 3 05:12:20 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.941 [Mon Sep 3 05:12:20 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 0, mean size = 6.79" [Mon Sep 3 06:54:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg exists [Mon Sep 3 06:54:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv [Mon Sep 3 06:54:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg exists [Mon Sep 3 06:54:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv [Mon Sep 3 06:54:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Sep 3 06:54:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists [Mon Sep 3 06:54:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.csv [Mon Sep 3 06:54:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists [Mon Sep 3 06:54:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.csv [Mon Sep 3 06:54:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Sep 3 10:43:57 2012] Warning, spatial fit 8 centroid is now closest to src. 11 [Mon Sep 3 10:43:57 2012] Source 9 is offset by 3.097365 and 2.967816 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.933356 x 1.933356, not incorporating fit results [Mon Sep 3 10:43:57 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1863.320000, observed total counts = 1479.000000 [Mon Sep 3 10:43:57 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Mon Sep 3 10:43:57 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 857.584000, observed total counts = 868.000000 [Mon Sep 3 10:43:57 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 3.597691 pixels [Mon Sep 3 10:43:57 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 8 to 39 [Mon Sep 3 10:43:57 2012] 835.714000 total counts/ 698.292000 bgd. counts: snr = 5.200412 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 3.597691 pixels Position = (309.2, 300.7) = 0 14 9.03 -30 21 35.4 Extent = 8.3 (6.3-10.8)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 137.4 +/- 28.9 Background counts = 698.3 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.003 [Mon Sep 3 10:43:57 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Sep 3 10:43:57 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Sep 3 10:43:57 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Mon Sep 3 10:43:57 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Sep 3 10:43:57 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Sep 3 10:43:57 2012] Source is confused with source 15 [Mon Sep 3 10:43:57 2012] Source is confused with source 40 [Mon Sep 3 10:44:35 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Sep 3 10:44:35 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.30" [Mon Sep 3 10:44:35 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 24, frac = 1.034 [Mon Sep 3 10:44:35 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 1, mean size = 8.30" [Mon Sep 3 13:14:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg exists [Mon Sep 3 13:14:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.csv [Mon Sep 3 13:14:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg exists [Mon Sep 3 13:14:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.csv [Mon Sep 3 13:14:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Sep 3 13:14:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists [Mon Sep 3 13:14:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.csv [Mon Sep 3 13:14:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists [Mon Sep 3 13:14:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.csv [Mon Sep 3 13:14:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Sep 3 17:04:31 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1639.190000, observed total counts = 1239.000000 [Mon Sep 3 17:04:31 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Mon Sep 3 17:04:31 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2678.250000, observed total counts = 2661.000000 [Mon Sep 3 17:04:31 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 3.014266 pixels [Mon Sep 3 17:04:31 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 8 to 9 [Mon Sep 3 17:04:31 2012] 2552.553000 total counts/ 2358.280000 bgd. counts: snr = 4.000504 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 3.014266 pixels Position = (306.2, 301.1) = 0 14 10.04 -30 21 33.9 Extent = 27.8 (27.8-55.6)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 194.3 +/- 50.5 Background counts = 2358.3 Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.004 [Mon Sep 3 17:04:31 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 884.946000, observed total counts = 881.000000 [Mon Sep 3 17:04:31 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 3.002842 pixels [Mon Sep 3 17:04:31 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 9 to 38 [Mon Sep 3 17:04:31 2012] 834.171000 total counts/ 804.090000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.060816 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 3.002842 pixels Position = (304.1, 298.9) = 0 14 10.74 -30 21 43.3 Extent = 13.2 (13.2-26.5)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 30.1 +/- 28.9 Background counts = 804.1 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.003 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability