[Mon Sep  3 05:11:24 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (272.6, 301.3) = 0 14 21.31 -30 21 30.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 44.4 +/- 11.3
  Background counts = 33.1
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0007

[Mon Sep  3 05:11:25 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.88'
[Mon Sep  3 08:38:12 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.37 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Sep  3 08:38:12 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.37"
[Mon Sep  3 08:38:12 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 18, frac = 0.935
[Mon Sep  3 08:38:12 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 51 for pass 0, mean size = 7.37"
[Mon Sep  3 10:43:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src51.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 10:43:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src51.csv
[Mon Sep  3 10:43:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src51_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 10:43:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src51.csv
[Mon Sep  3 10:43:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src51_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src51.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Sep  3 10:43:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 10:43:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.csv
[Mon Sep  3 10:43:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 10:43:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.csv
[Mon Sep  3 10:43:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src51.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Sep  3 10:44:21 2012] Warning, spatial fit 51 centroid is now closest to src. 22
[Mon Sep  3 10:44:21 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Sep  3 10:44:21 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Sep  3 10:44:21 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Sep  3 10:44:21 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Sep  3 10:44:21 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Sep  3 10:44:21 2012] Source is confused with source 21
[Mon Sep  3 14:51:27 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.37 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Sep  3 14:51:27 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.37"
[Mon Sep  3 14:51:27 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 18, frac = 0.935
[Mon Sep  3 14:51:27 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 38 for pass 1, mean size = 7.37"
[Mon Sep  3 17:04:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src38.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 17:04:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src38.csv
[Mon Sep  3 17:04:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src38_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 17:04:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src38.csv
[Mon Sep  3 17:04:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src38_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src38.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Sep  3 17:04:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src38.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 17:04:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src38.csv
[Mon Sep  3 17:04:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src38_1.ximg exists
[Mon Sep  3 17:04:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src38.csv
[Mon Sep  3 17:04:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src38_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0042340101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src38.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Sep  3 17:04:47 2012] Source 41 is offset by 7.405192 and -6.282667 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.892869 x 6.776828, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Sep  3 17:04:47 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Sep  3 17:04:47 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Sep  3 17:04:47 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Sep  3 17:04:47 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Sep  3 17:04:47 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Sep  3 17:04:47 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9