[Tue Jul 10 10:08:30 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (237.9, 322.8) = 21 7 24.20 38 45 27.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 30.8 +/- 6.5
  Background counts = 2.2
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0007

[Tue Jul 10 10:08:30 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.73'
[Tue Jul 10 10:46:31 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.79 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 10 10:46:31 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.79"
[Tue Jul 10 10:46:31 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.668
[Tue Jul 10 10:46:31 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 8.79"
[Tue Jul 10 11:00:29 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0041740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 10 11:00:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0041740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Tue Jul 10 11:00:29 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0041740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 10 11:00:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0041740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Tue Jul 10 11:00:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0041740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0041740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 10 11:00:29 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0041740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 10 11:00:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0041740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Tue Jul 10 11:00:29 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0041740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 10 11:00:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0041740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Tue Jul 10 11:00:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0041740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0041740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 10 11:00:35 2012] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 4 at 16.873641 pixels away
[Tue Jul 10 11:00:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul 10 11:00:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul 10 11:00:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul 10 11:00:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul 10 11:00:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul 10 11:19:57 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.79 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 10 11:19:57 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.79"
[Tue Jul 10 11:19:57 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.668
[Tue Jul 10 11:19:57 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 1, mean size = 8.79"
[Tue Jul 10 11:28:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0041740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 10 11:28:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0041740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Tue Jul 10 11:28:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0041740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 10 11:28:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0041740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Tue Jul 10 11:28:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0041740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0041740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 10 11:28:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0041740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 10 11:28:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0041740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Tue Jul 10 11:28:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0041740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 10 11:28:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0041740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Tue Jul 10 11:28:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0041740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0041740301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 10 11:28:59 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 134.627000, observed total counts = 43.000000
[Tue Jul 10 11:28:59 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 4
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jul 10 11:28:59 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul 10 11:28:59 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul 10 11:28:59 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul 10 11:28:59 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul 10 11:28:59 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul 10 11:28:59 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9