[Sun Jul 15 20:16:12 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (303.2, 327.0) = 10 0 8.64 -19 34 35.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 37.5 +/- 8.9
  Background counts = 10.6
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005

[Sun Jul 15 20:16:12 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.10'
[Sun Jul 15 20:44:42 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.48 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jul 15 20:44:42 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.48"
[Sun Jul 15 20:44:42 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.812
[Sun Jul 15 20:44:42 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 0, mean size = 7.48"
[Sun Jul 15 21:21:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0041180301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 21:21:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0041180301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.csv
[Sun Jul 15 21:21:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0041180301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 21:21:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0041180301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.csv
[Sun Jul 15 21:21:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0041180301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0041180301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jul 15 21:21:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0041180301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 21:21:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0041180301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 21:21:01 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0041180301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16 appears to have run properly
[Sun Jul 15 21:59:48 2012] Source 10 is offset by 7.038758 and -3.520343 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.859720 x 0.859720, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jul 15 21:59:48 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jul 15 21:59:48 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jul 15 21:59:48 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jul 15 21:59:48 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jul 15 21:59:48 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jul 15 22:18:36 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.48 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jul 15 22:18:36 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.48"
[Sun Jul 15 22:18:36 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.812
[Sun Jul 15 22:18:36 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 1, mean size = 7.48"
[Sun Jul 15 23:07:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0041180301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 23:07:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0041180301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 23:07:47 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0041180301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14 appears to have run properly
[Sun Jul 15 23:07:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0041180301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 23:07:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0041180301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 15 23:07:47 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0041180301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14 appears to have run properly
[Sun Jul 15 23:43:25 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 151.979000, observed total counts = 152.000000
[Sun Jul 15 23:43:25 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 0.527914 pixels
[Sun Jul 15 23:43:25 2012] 146.467000 total counts/ 130.437000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.403567
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 0.527914 pixels
  Position = (302.8, 327.4) = 10 0 8.76 -19 34 35.6
  Extent = 2.8 (1.9-4.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 16.0 +/- 12.1
  Background counts = 130.4
  Rate = 0.0008 +/- 0.0006
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability