[Sat May  4 01:44:17 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (274.1, 240.9) = 17 28 23.83 -14 18 41.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 99.1 +/- 13.0
  Background counts = 23.8
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0004

[Sat May  4 01:44:18 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.53'
[Sat May  4 02:29:24 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.69 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May  4 02:29:24 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.69"
[Sat May  4 02:29:24 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.641
[Sat May  4 02:29:24 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 0, mean size = 8.69"
[Sat May  4 03:57:27 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0041160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 03:57:27 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0041160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.csv
[Sat May  4 03:57:27 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0041160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 03:57:27 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0041160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.csv
[Sat May  4 03:57:27 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0041160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0041160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  4 03:57:27 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0041160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 03:57:27 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0041160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Sat May  4 03:57:27 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0041160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 03:57:27 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0041160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Sat May  4 03:57:27 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0041160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0041160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  4 03:57:37 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 610.626000, observed total counts = 232.000000
[Sat May  4 03:57:37 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 24
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  4 03:57:37 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May  4 03:57:37 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May  4 03:57:37 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May  4 03:57:37 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May  4 03:57:37 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May  4 04:17:52 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.69 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May  4 04:17:52 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.69"
[Sat May  4 04:17:52 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.641
[Sat May  4 04:17:52 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 1, mean size = 8.69"
[Sat May  4 05:23:23 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0041160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 05:23:23 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0041160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Sat May  4 05:23:23 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0041160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 05:23:23 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0041160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Sat May  4 05:23:23 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0041160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0041160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  4 05:23:23 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0041160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 05:23:23 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0041160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Sat May  4 05:23:23 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0041160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  4 05:23:23 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0041160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Sat May  4 05:23:23 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0041160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0041160101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  4 05:23:30 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 774.277000, observed total counts = 232.000000
[Sat May  4 05:23:30 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 24
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  4 05:23:30 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May  4 05:23:30 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May  4 05:23:30 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May  4 05:23:30 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May  4 05:23:30 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May  4 05:23:30 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0