[Wed Jun 20 03:36:17 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (353.4, 220.5) = 23 0 26.85 58 48 6.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 68.5 +/- 15.7
  Background counts = 80.3
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005

[Wed Jun 20 03:36:17 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.91'
[Wed Jun 20 09:38:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.88 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jun 20 09:38:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.88"
[Wed Jun 20 09:38:52 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.813
[Wed Jun 20 09:38:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 96 for pass 0, mean size = 9.88"
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src96.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src96.csv
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src96_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src96.csv
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src96_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src96.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:27 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src96.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:27 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src96_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:27 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src96 appears to have run properly
[Wed Jun 20 15:30:14 2012] Source 113 is offset by -6.481337 and 0.668169 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.231812 x 1.231812, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jun 20 15:30:14 2012] Source 113 is offset by 0.384841 and -1.155742 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.136143 x 1.136143, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jun 20 15:30:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jun 20 15:30:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jun 20 15:30:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jun 20 15:30:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jun 20 15:30:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jun 20 15:30:14 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9