[Wed Jun 20 03:36:14 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (199.8, 305.9) = 23 1 53.00 58 54 4.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 284.2 +/- 29.6
  Background counts = 316.5
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.001

[Wed Jun 20 03:36:17 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.17'
[Wed Jun 20 09:38:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jun 20 09:38:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.02"
[Wed Jun 20 09:38:52 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 31, frac = 0.987
[Wed Jun 20 09:38:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 0, mean size = 10.02"
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.csv
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.csv
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 20 15:30:13 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 4370.830000, observed total counts = 3704.000000
[Wed Jun 20 15:30:13 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 11
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jun 20 15:30:13 2012] Source 11 is offset by -4.807292 and -0.970105 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.171701 x 1.171701, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jun 20 15:30:14 2012] Source 11 is offset by -3.652027 and 1.220722 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.542133 x 2.542133, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jun 20 15:30:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jun 20 15:30:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jun 20 15:30:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jun 20 15:30:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jun 20 15:30:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jun 20 15:30:14 2012] Source is confused with source 92
[Thu Jun 21 02:50:31 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun 21 02:50:31 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.02"
[Thu Jun 21 02:50:31 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 31, frac = 0.987
[Thu Jun 21 02:50:31 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 1, mean size = 10.02"
[Thu Jun 21 08:47:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 21 08:47:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.csv
[Thu Jun 21 08:47:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 21 08:47:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.csv
[Thu Jun 21 08:47:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 21 08:47:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 21 08:47:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.csv
[Thu Jun 21 08:47:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 21 08:47:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.csv
[Thu Jun 21 08:47:21 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 21 08:48:09 2012] Source 11 is offset by -8.437591 and -1.307921 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.151195 x 1.151195, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun 21 08:48:09 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 4369.950000, observed total counts = 3704.000000
[Thu Jun 21 08:48:09 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 11
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun 21 08:48:09 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 12723.300000, observed total counts = 12711.000000
[Thu Jun 21 08:48:09 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 2.628960 pixels
[Thu Jun 21 08:48:09 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 8 to 22
[Thu Jun 21 08:48:09 2012] 12561.394900 total counts/ 12548.500000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.115112
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 2.628960 pixels
  Position = (197.5, 307.3) = 23 1 54.28 58 54 20.7
  Extent = 5.1" x 5.1", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 12.9 +/- 112.1
  Background counts = 12548.5
  Rate = 0.0003 +/- 0.002
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability