[Wed Jun 20 03:35:15 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (240.1, 392.8) = 23 1 30.45 59 0 38.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 89.8 +/- 19.7 Background counts = 121.6 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0006 [Wed Jun 20 03:35:17 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.04' [Wed Jun 20 04:12:48 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.45 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Jun 20 04:12:48 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.45" [Wed Jun 20 04:12:48 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.068 [Wed Jun 20 04:12:48 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 95 for pass 0, mean size = 10.45" [Wed Jun 20 09:38:49 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.ximg exists [Wed Jun 20 09:38:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.csv [Wed Jun 20 09:38:49 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95_1.ximg exists [Wed Jun 20 09:38:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.csv [Wed Jun 20 09:38:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jun 20 09:38:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95.ximg exists [Wed Jun 20 09:38:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95.csv [Wed Jun 20 09:38:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95_1.ximg exists [Wed Jun 20 09:38:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95.csv [Wed Jun 20 09:38:52 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jun 20 15:29:53 2012] Warning, spatial fit 95 centroid is now closest to src. 71 [Wed Jun 20 15:29:53 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Jun 20 15:29:53 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Jun 20 15:29:53 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Jun 20 15:29:53 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Jun 20 15:29:53 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Jun 20 15:29:53 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0