[Wed Jun 20 03:35:14 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (185.8, 330.9) = 23 2 0.90 58 56 3.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 223.7 +/- 29.3
  Background counts = 286.6
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.001

[Wed Jun 20 03:35:17 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.50'
[Wed Jun 20 04:12:48 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.68 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jun 20 04:12:48 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.68"
[Wed Jun 20 04:12:48 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 29, frac = 0.831
[Wed Jun 20 04:12:48 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 0, mean size = 10.68"
[Wed Jun 20 09:38:48 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 20 09:38:48 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 20 09:38:48 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17 appears to have run properly
[Wed Jun 20 09:38:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 20 09:38:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 20 09:38:50 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17 appears to have run properly
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:53 2012] Warning, spatial fit 17 centroid is now closest to src. 32
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:53 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:53 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:53 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:53 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:53 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jun 20 15:29:53 2012] Source is confused with source 13
[Wed Jun 20 15:41:50 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.68 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jun 20 15:41:50 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.68"
[Wed Jun 20 15:41:50 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 29, frac = 0.831
[Wed Jun 20 15:41:50 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 1, mean size = 10.68"
[Thu Jun 21 02:50:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 21 02:50:22 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Thu Jun 21 02:50:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 21 02:50:22 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Thu Jun 21 02:50:22 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 21 02:50:27 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 21 02:50:27 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 21 02:50:27 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0038140101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17 appears to have run properly
[Thu Jun 21 08:47:48 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2956.240000, observed total counts = 3014.000000
[Thu Jun 21 08:47:48 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 36 = 0.628673 pixels
[Thu Jun 21 08:47:48 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 17 to 6
[Thu Jun 21 08:47:48 2012] 2846.379550 total counts/ 2837.690000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.163123
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 36 = 0.628673 pixels
  Position = (185.2, 330.8) = 23 2 1.25 58 56 2.7
  Extent = 2.8 (2.8-3.4)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 8.7 +/- 53.4
  Background counts = 2837.7
  Rate = 0.0002 +/- 0.001
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability