[Fri Jun  8 03:11:57 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (405.9, 209.3) = 2 23 34.36 -3 57 26.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 38.0 +/- 8.6
  Background counts = 10.6
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.001

[Fri Jun  8 03:11:57 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.12'
[Fri Jun  8 03:13:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun  8 03:13:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.49"
[Fri Jun  8 03:13:18 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.912
[Fri Jun  8 03:13:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 11.49"
[Fri Jun  8 03:27:13 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  8 03:27:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Fri Jun  8 03:27:13 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  8 03:27:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Fri Jun  8 03:27:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0037980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0037980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun  8 03:27:13 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  8 03:27:13 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  8 03:27:13 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0037980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jun  8 03:46:14 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 9 at 11.416057 pixels away
[Fri Jun  8 03:46:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun  8 03:46:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun  8 03:46:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun  8 03:46:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun  8 03:46:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun  8 03:46:22 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun  8 03:46:22 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.49"
[Fri Jun  8 03:46:22 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.912
[Fri Jun  8 03:46:22 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 11.49"
[Fri Jun  8 04:00:08 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  8 04:00:08 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  8 04:00:08 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0037980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jun  8 04:00:08 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  8 04:00:08 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  8 04:00:08 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0037980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Fri Jun  8 04:16:40 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 196.171000, observed total counts = 194.000000
[Fri Jun  8 04:16:40 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.528044 pixels
[Fri Jun  8 04:16:40 2012] 200.593800 total counts/ 183.677000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.248219
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.528044 pixels
  Position = (405.8, 209.9) = 2 23 34.39 -3 57 25.4
  Extent = 2.9" x 2.9", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 16.9 +/- 14.2
  Background counts = 183.7
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.002
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability