[Sat Jun  9 10:07:29 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (266.1, 236.1) = 13 15 32.41 -16 25 56.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 151.2 +/- 25.0
  Background counts = 205.5
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.002

[Sat Jun  9 10:07:30 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.09'
[Sat Jun  9 10:13:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.97 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  9 10:13:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.97"
[Sat Jun  9 10:13:18 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.952
[Sat Jun  9 10:13:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 35 for pass 0, mean size = 8.97"
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src35.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src35.csv
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src35_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src35.csv
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src35_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src35.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src35.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src35.csv
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src35_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src35.csv
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src35_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src35.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 4367.760000, observed total counts = 2684.000000
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 39
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Warning, spatial fit 35 centroid is now closest to src. 8
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Source is confused with source 8
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:47 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.97 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:47 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.97"
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:47 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.952
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:47 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 25 for pass 1, mean size = 8.97"
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25.csv
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25.csv
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:55 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:55 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:55 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Warning, spatial fit 25 centroid is now closest to src. 8
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9