[Sat Jun  9 10:07:29 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (326.0, 256.1) = 13 15 14.31 -16 24 29.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 137.4 +/- 25.0
  Background counts = 261.5
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.002

[Sat Jun  9 10:07:30 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.66'
[Sat Jun  9 10:13:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  9 10:13:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.26"
[Sat Jun  9 10:13:18 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.869
[Sat Jun  9 10:13:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 33 for pass 0, mean size = 8.26"
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:04 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33.csv
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:04 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33.csv
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33.csv
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33.csv
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Warning: source 33 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 37 at 14.819521 pixels away
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:47 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:47 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.26"
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:47 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.869
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:47 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 1, mean size = 8.26"
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:55 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:55 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:55 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3580.320000, observed total counts = 3025.000000
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 37
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9