[Sat Jun  9 10:07:29 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (323.5, 304.2) = 13 15 15.06 -16 21 1.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 118.4 +/- 24.6
  Background counts = 253.1
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.002

[Sat Jun  9 10:07:30 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.87'
[Sat Jun  9 10:13:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.36 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  9 10:13:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.36"
[Sat Jun  9 10:13:18 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.040
[Sat Jun  9 10:13:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 28 for pass 0, mean size = 7.36"
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.csv
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.csv
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.csv
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.csv
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Source 31 is offset by -0.106069 and 2.868414 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.828520 x 0.828520, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Source 31 is offset by -6.106069 and 5.868414 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.828520 x 0.828520, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Source is confused with source 27
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:47 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.36 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:47 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.36"
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:47 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.040
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:47 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 20 for pass 1, mean size = 7.36"
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.csv
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.csv
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:55 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:55 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:55 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Warning, spatial fit 20 centroid is now closest to src. 27
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 4022.810000, observed total counts = 3200.000000
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 31
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9