[Sat Jun  9 10:07:29 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (299.9, 309.8) = 13 15 22.21 -16 20 36.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 146.8 +/- 27.7
  Background counts = 294.7
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.002

[Sat Jun  9 10:07:30 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.83'
[Sat Jun  9 10:13:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.84 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  9 10:13:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.84"
[Sat Jun  9 10:13:18 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.931
[Sat Jun  9 10:13:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 6.84"
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Sat Jun  9 12:28:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Source 25 is offset by 6.160502 and -7.511606 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.343490 x 1.343490, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:14 2012] Source is confused with source 30
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:47 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.84 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:47 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.84"
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:47 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.931
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:47 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 15 for pass 1, mean size = 6.84"
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.csv
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.csv
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:55 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:55 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 17:21:55 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15 appears to have run properly
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Source 25 is offset by -0.674524 and -7.511606 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.862441 x 0.862441, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Warning: source 16 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 25 at 20.011038 pixels away
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:19 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9