[Sat Jun  9 10:09:07 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (278.4, 286.4) = 13 15 28.69 -16 22 20.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 505.8 +/- 31.7
  Background counts = 153.3
  Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.002

[Sat Jun  9 10:09:09 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.70'
[Sat Jun  9 13:54:00 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.28 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  9 13:54:00 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.28"
[Sat Jun  9 13:54:00 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.900
[Sat Jun  9 13:54:00 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 0, mean size = 7.28"
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:58 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:58 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:58 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6 appears to have run properly
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:31 2012] Source 7 is offset by 2.712954 and 0.713779 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.270359 x 1.270359, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:31 2012] Warning, spatial fit 6 centroid is now closest to src. 4
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:31 2012] Source is confused with source 6
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.28 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.28"
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.900
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 1, mean size = 7.28"
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.csv
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.csv
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Source 7 is offset by 2.082540 and -1.685922 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.270359 x 1.270359, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Warning, spatial fit 6 centroid is now closest to src. 4
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2042.810000, observed total counts = 2018.000000
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 7 = 4.434089 pixels
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 6 to 21
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] 2045.962000 total counts/ 1897.900000 bgd. counts: snr = 3.398654
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 7 = 4.434089 pixels
  Position = (274.3, 288.1) = 13 15 29.94 -16 22 11.6
  Extent = 15.1 (15.0-30.2)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 148.1 +/- 45.2
  Background counts = 1897.9
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.002
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00