[Sat Jun  9 10:09:07 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (281.4, 277.8) = 13 15 27.78 -16 22 54.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 1060.9 +/- 44.4
  Background counts = 165.6
  Rate = 0.05 +/- 0.002

[Sat Jun  9 10:09:09 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.94'
[Sat Jun  9 13:54:00 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.40 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  9 13:54:00 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.40"
[Sat Jun  9 13:54:00 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.033
[Sat Jun  9 13:54:00 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 0, mean size = 7.40"
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:58 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:58 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:58 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Sat Jun  9 15:30:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:31 2012] Warning, spatial fit 3 centroid is now closest to src. 7
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:31 2012] Source 4 is offset by -6.673352 and 0.920544 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.262584 x 1.262584, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun  9 15:31:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.40 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.40"
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.033
[Sat Jun  9 17:55:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 1, mean size = 7.40"
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:08 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0037950101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Warning, spatial fit 3 centroid is now closest to src. 7
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 4627.520000, observed total counts = 3819.000000
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 4
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun  9 19:10:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00